I sympathise with the sentiment, but: this would give a largeish party of 100000 members a budget of £2.5 million per year. Let's say in a typical year there are public elections of some variety in areas containing 10 million households. I think a political party can reasonably expect to be allowed to deliver an election-address leaflet to every household. That gives them 25p per leaflet to get them printed. I'm not convinced that's feasible.
Yep, that sounds like a decent plan.
Now what to we do about donations in kind via big media proprietors publishing partisan editorial content for free?
That's a more difficult problem to fix, but conveniently many of our media moguls are tax exiles so there might be options to explore.
Central funding for political parties would be the alternative, altho this model is criticised as a waste of taxpayer's money by those parties and politicians that benefit disproportionately from private donations.
@only_ohm @georgemonbiot.bsky.social
One issue is that membership fees can vary and that can be distorting too. Better to set a combined cap for individual contributions. The govt could fund a FREEPOST printing of a set size, as well as delivery which it currently provides. .
A lot of the money, though, goes on online ads; there is a huge regulatory hole in that space generally.
@georgemonbiot.bsky.social But - those accepting the payments don't factor that money into their political decisions, right?
Right?
<Padmé Amidala face>