Ars Technica14h ago
NASA kills lunar space station to focus on ambitious Moon base
"Everyone wants to be on the surface."
https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/03/nasa-kills-lunar-space-station-to-focus-on-ambitious-moon-base/?utm_brand=arstechnica&utm_social-type=owned&utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social
Show threadBrett14h ago

@arstechnica

We already know how to build space stations though. We’ve never built habitats on another world.

Show threadDylan10h ago
@bflipp @arstechnica Come on, we've built tons of houses!
Show threadBrett9h ago

@dy @arstechnica

We don’t even know if we can land on the moon successfully again.

Damn sure do not have any landers close to being able to test. We don’t even have a vehicle that can get people there and back yet and we’re already signing up for a much harder mission.

Show threadThe Worst Timeline6h ago
@bflipp @dy @arstechnica
That’s not even considering the nature of lunar dust. That stuff is pernicious, abrasive, and about as benign to astronauts as asbestos is to construction workers.
Show threadBrett5h ago

@millardjk @dy @arstechnica

Isn’t it binding in the lungs the same way asbestos is too? I seem to remember something about that.

Show threadThe Worst Timeline

@bflipp @dy @arstechnica Exactly, which is why I used that specific metaphor.

It’s probably closer to volcanic ash, but I think more people have familiarity with asbestos warnings as opposed to ash.

4:29amWeb