Can the validity of historical treaties be challenged today? In the 19th century, Coast Salish Indigenous communities signed treaties that transferred vast areas of land to the United States, often under unequal conditions or without full understanding. Today, disputes over land and fishing rights continue, showing how these agreements still shape present-day inequalities. If consent is unequal, can the outcome ever be just?
📖https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/politics-and-government/treaties-and-agreements-american-indians-united-states
Russia Sells Alaska to the United States | History | Research Starters | EBSCO Research

<p>The sale of Alaska by Russia to the United States in 1867 marked a significant moment in North American history. Following unofficial negotiations before the Civil War, formal discussions resumed after the war under the guidance of Baron Edouard de Stoeckl, the Russian minister to the U.S. Motivated by several factors, including concerns over British expansion and the failure of the Russian American Company, Russia agreed to sell Alaska for $7.2 million. The treaty was signed on March 30, 1867, but the formal transfer took place on October 18 of the same year, delayed by issues in Congress regarding funding.</p> <p>The acquisition was met with mixed reactions from the American public, with some viewing it as a folly while others saw it as a strategic move to enhance U.S. territory and secure friendship with Russia. Upon the transfer, around 30,000 indigenous Alaskans and a small number of Russians were living in the territory. Initially, U.S. governance over Alaska was marked by neglect and disorder, significantly impacting the native populations. It wasn't until the Organic Act of 1884 that a more structured government was established, leading to improvements in the living conditions of the inhabitants. The legacy of Russian rule, particularly through the Russian Orthodox Church, continues to be felt in Alaska today.</p>

EBSCO