I can't believe how Europe, Australia and pretty much everywhere else people believe the propaganda about China's supposedly amazing railway network and rolling stock industry, shared all over the place by the dictatorship's business initiatives.

It hurts my soul to defend Alstom, Siemens or Stadler but if you every looked closer to a CRRC train, you will soon understand how European rolling stock is decades ahead of what China builds.

Let me explain and start with the economics.

- Westbahn ordered 15 Stadler KISS trains for 300 mio EUR (20 mio per trainset)
- Westbahn leased four CRRC DDMU02 trains for 70 mio EUR for a period of 10 years including maintenance (18 mio EUR per trainset)

- Leo Express ordered five Stadler FLIRT trains for 60 mio EUR (12 mio per trainset)
- Leo Express ordered 30 CRRC Sirius trains for 200 mio EUR (7 mio per trainset)

We keep hearing how European manufacturers cannot compete with Chinese prices. Yes, the trains are cheap and the overall offers good - but there is definitely no unreasonable price gap. And all that despite CRRC as a state-owned enterprise profiting from any kind of financial and political support, humans rights violating exploitation in the employees and large scale forced labor in the supply chain.

But if we compare the prices, it's not such a huge difference. The key factor is rather the delivery time : As a Chinese state company, the priority is always supplying foreign offers first in hope to permanently establish a supply chain. Therefore, CRRC can immediately start building newly ordered trains - a lure offer to establish China on international markets.

So far the business side.

Let's talk about the rolling stock itself.

As a brief history, CRRC was established from the so-called "Harmony" (Hexie) initiative of China's dictatorship regime. Hexie refers to the first generation of Chinese high-speed trains built by European and Japanese companies locally in China using technology-transfer. This way, CRRC got all the knowledge from Alstom, Bombardier, Kawasaki and Siemens to develop their own future trains.

Chinese trains are incredibly fast and amazing press pictures, mock-ups and even prototypes carrying the narrative of comfortable, modern and affordable trains dominate the western view on Chinese railways. These narratives are repeated, prayed over and over with no evidence.

Yes, trains are fast. That's it. CRRC has combined and improved the foreign technology to operate at higher speeds of 350 - 400 kph. The rest of it is propaganda. The trains technology is not advanced. The trains are bumpy, unoptimized and shaky - even on the most modern tracks at medium speed. The hardware is unreliable, everything is optimized on low cost, neither on safety nor on quality and sustainability.

Despite that, railways are incredibly expensive in China. They are configured in budget airline style with the cheapest interior possible in 1st and 2nd class. The exception is the business class (surprise : That's what the propaganda machine feeds to the international news). While we believe the song of affordable railways accessible to everyone, tickets here are at the same price and often more expensive than on the flagship high-speed networks in Europe - absolutely unaffordable for the average Chinese citizen who's not living a privileged higher class life.

I don't know why we all believe this, but seeing western companies falling into the trap of CRRC's lure offers for cheap trains is entirely incomprehensive to me. Chinese rolling stock is not the long awaited new wind for modern and affordable railways but a pitfall into the scrapyard of deprecated, crappy and unthoughtfully built rolling stock covered by a beautiful mask and pipe dreams.

Crappy trains sold at over expensive prices despite the dictatorship's government subsidies, cruel exploitation of the workers and forced labor in the supply chains.

China is not just a business partner with another culture. It's a cruel dictatorship putting all effort in propaganda, business and dependency of the western world.

If we're serious about railways, about liberty and human rights, we buy rolling stock in democratic countries with worker's rights, independent human rights organizations and real innovation in building trains.

China is not an alternative source of rolling stock but a cruel dictatorship eliminating its own population in concentration camps and supporting slavery through forced labor to reach its economic power.

All information in this post was researched at best effort. I'm not a train manufacturer not an economist or human-rights expert. I'm just an individual concerned about what's happening. Especially the human-rights situation in China is hard to proof due to the absolute surveillance and repression against anyone speaking up.

Cynically, I wrote this post while traveling aboard of a  CR400AF-Z train in China.

#China #CRRC #Railways #Souvereignity #HumanRights

@lewd I understand the rest but not really this specifically:

> Despite that, railways are incredibly expensive in China. They are configured in budget airline style with the cheapest interior possible in 1st and 2nd class. The exception is the business class (surprise : That's what the propaganda machine feeds to the international news). While we believe the song of affordable railways accessible to everyone, tickets here are at the same price and often more expensive than on the flagship high-speed networks in Europe - absolutely unaffordable for the average Chinese citizen who's not living a privileged higher class life.

Their 2nd class seems to be quite comparable to 2nd class in ICE (yes it's 2+3, but they also have a larger loading gauge = wider bodies), definitely not worse than some of the absolutely cramped TGVs I've been in.

But especially the ticket prices, last time I've checked they didn't have dynamic pricing and cost like around 5-6 euro per 100 track-km (in 2nd class), which is something you can only get on high-speed rail in Europe in domestic journeys on super saver fare purchased well in advance?
And longer-distance journeys (like 2k km) in Europe are not only incredibly expensive but also incredibly poor. For example, Beijing to Guangzhou (which is not "the absolute flagship line") is roughly the same distance as Warsaw to Barcelona or Berlin to Madrid, but Beijing to Guangzhou is ~130 euro in 2nd class, taking less than 8 hours, without interchanges. While trying to get from Warsaw to Barcelona or from Berlin to Madrid without Interrail is the world of pain and easily over 200 euro even when bought half a year in advance, and even with interrail, with all the supplements, it's going to be around 400 euro for round-trip, take over 24 hours with a bunch of changes, where even one train delay will mean 30+ hours for the complete journey (plus having to spend a night somewhere).
So I just don't see how is it "often more expensive than on the flagship high-speed networks in Europe"?
And technology might be not advanced, but connections are. Sure, EU could have used the same technology it has now to provide decent longer-distance connections, but the fact is that it doesn't and China does?

And sure, KRM or LGV Est-Europeenne could be good, but also they're small (and expensive).
You can get from Cologne to Frankfurt (170km of track) in just a bit under one hour, for like 60-80 euro when bought for tomorrow, 30-40 when bought in advance, 20 being the absolute lowest price. While there is a bunch of trains e.g. from Wuhan to Changsha (350km of track) taking 1:11, with tickets available (from what I understand) for tomorrow for 30 euro.
Or you can get from Strasbourg to Paris (~450km of track?) in ~1:40, but for tomorrow it costs 75-125 euro, and typically it's only under 50 euro on ouigo trains (and even then it's still around 25 euro when bought way in advance), and I find it difficult to believe that "cheapest interior possible in 2nd class" in China can somehow be worse than "cheapest interior possible in 2nd class" on ouigo?