The German 'charging disease' has now also hit Vattenfall. Despite claiming 'fair pricing regardless of payment method', customers with a different charging card are paying more. This is not how roaming — the ability to use any charger with any EV, charging card or app — should work.

RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:xf53ujprnmfktaxb77fztor6/post/3mhs42okugk2i
And roaming is, just like ad hoc payments – meaning you can pay straight away with your bank card without having to register – important: easy access to all charging points (and information) is key for the mass market.
The upcoming review of the European #AFIR cannot avoid imposing much stricter regulations, as the market has proven that it lacks the capacity for self-organisation and self-regulation.
This also includes the regulation of roaming platforms. Partly due to #AFIR requirements regarding technical standards that necessitate certification, some roaming platforms are becoming indispensable (a choice driven by the industry).
Without effective competition between different roaming platforms, there is no cost pressure. Users thus end up paying for the inefficiency of the system. These quasi-monopolies – even setting aside AFIR – should be sufficient grounds for regulators to intervene.
Regrettably, the German market regulator is of the opinion that the situation is made better by turning the lights off rather than shining the spotlight on it.

RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:rjcjs4yvydskeq4mvxlmphv6/post/3leyen3g46k2i