I am increasingly convinced that this low-context naming system is the only one that makes sense for icon sets beyond ~500 glyphs. it runs circles around having to guess names like “share success, share complete, share check, confirm share, share confirmation, shar
@samhenrigold i think all icon sets should be labeled like this. Especially at work, I’m sick of trying to remember what arbitrary label the art director put on something, when none of the words say what the elements of the icon actually are.