@oblomov @xvln I dunno... from my point of view (as a non-artist, non-writer, but lifelong writer of software), "AI" slop is slop pretty much regardless of the medium.
It *really* stands out for me in art and the written word, where the quirks and limitations of these tools are pretty obvious and distracting.
I think it can be harder to see in software if you're not looking at the source code, because the slop is often buried a bit deeper below the surface, and the tells are more indirect.
@xvln @oblomov The principle of the thing absolutely bothers me. I've been writing software for 40 years, ~30 professionally, and I find the dependence on these tools appalling and incredibly depressing.
I'm fortunate to be in a place where I don't have some asshole managers telling me I have to use these tools instead of doing it right. Sad to see the industry destroy itself.
I enjoy designing, building, and *understanding* systems top to bottom and "ai" tooling is antithetical to that.
@xvln @oblomov I suspect it's possible to use some of this stuff in moderation, but I really have no interest in ceding my thinking and comprehension to tools that do not actually think or comprehend or have any ability to know what is real or correct.
Hell, half the fun of the work I do is constantly learning new things and I certainly have no desire to give that up.
I also, maybe arrogantly, take pride in my work and believe there is art as well as science to good systems design.
</rant>