Interview: "Republicans are singularly focused on making it harder to vote".

Trump's SAVE Act targets women, poor, rural & trans voters.

"Millions of citizens who lack easy access to required forms of documentation are now at risk of disenfranchisement."

Groups most at risk include people who've changed their names; older voters who never received birth certificates; & rural voters who may face difficulties with registering to vote.

https://www.democracynow.org/2026/3/20/save_america_act_voting_rights

#USPol #EUPol #SAVEact #racism .

Disenfranchise Tens of Millions? Trump’s SAVE Act Targets Women, Poor, Rural & Trans Voters

Experts are calling it “the worst voter suppression bill ever seriously considered by Congress.” As the U.S. Senate prepares to vote on a Trump-backed voter ID bill known as the SAVE Act, millions of citizens who lack easy access to its required forms of documentation are now at risk of disenfranchisement. “Republicans are singularly focused on making it harder to vote and pursuing this MAGA fever dream,” explains Ari Berman, national voting rights correspondent for Mother Jones. “It is the overarching goal of the Republican Party now to make it harder to vote.” The groups most at risk of disenfranchisement include people who have changed their names after marriage, older voters who never received birth certificates, rural voters who could find it increasingly difficult to register to vote and trans people who have changed their names or gender markers on government documents. The GOP and MAGA movement’s goal, says Imara Jones, the founder and CEO of TransLash Media, “is to enshrine anti-trans discrimination in the law, because what they’re doing is using trans people as a road test in order to try to figure out how to disenfranchise and marginalize and strip citizenship away from millions of Americans who disagree with them.”

Democracy Now!
@DrALJONES Reps ~are~ singularly focused on making it harder to vote.
But it seems corporate Dems are singularly focused on making it useless to vote. 😔
#VoteGreen #ButchWareCA

@MySideIsHumanity

Yes, exactly. They have been for decades. What happens when the same oligarchs own both parties.

@DrALJONES @MySideIsHumanity Decades is right! Ralph Nader observed that there was only one corporate party, with two heads - he called it the 'duopoly.' That was in the '70s, even before he founded Public Citizen.
The big kerfuffel then was over the public financing of elections bill that Congress passed after Nixon's Watergate scandal. The Supreme Court overturned it in its 1976 Buckley v. Valeo ruling, enshrining the "Money = Speech" doctrine by which oligarchy replaced democracy.

@PttP @DrALJONES @MySideIsHumanity

And Hunter S Thompson was already thoroughly sick of it and wondering how many more rounds of this "lesser evil" game we'd have to suffer through IN NINETEEN SEVENTY FUCKING THREE.

@violetmadder @PttP @DrALJONES For that matter, Upton Sinclair was skewering this game in 1906 (The Jungle).

Modernize the language, and it would sound like 2016.