Was thinking recently about Stuart Brown's video on the "Chicken-o-meter," and wondering if there are examples of this strategy in #datavis. Where quantitative data are communicated w/ a discrete set of iconic/associative symbols, rather than continuously varying size/color/etc. https://youtu.be/B8HT8aUb5q4?si=3JS_cqH9EvbYXaUs
@pinakographos do you mean Chernov(?) faces?
@mhedney Chernoff faces are sort of in line with the idea, though they feel separate to me. Their appearance as faces is often only weakly connected to the individual datasets, and the whole of the symbol is based on multiple datasets instead of communicating one. But, I think there's a connection of some sort.
@pinakographos @mhedney I'm sure I read once that Chernoff invented these as an example of how not to do data viz, but somehow they caught on.
@geospacedman @mhedney In his initial paper, I believe Chernoff used faces to visualize *geology data*, so I'd believe that.