Everyone seemingly getting mad about systemd adding a completely optional date of birth field to user records that is, in reality, only ever going to be filled in on the machines of children administered by parents who want such restrictions enforced, perhaps on machines administered by schools, or by people who want their computer to wish them a happy birthday.

There’s a lot that can be said about the ineffectiveness of age gates or the problems of rating systems but those are better directed at legislators rather than open source maintainers working to ensure that distros are in legal compliance with flawed legislation by the deadline, especially with regards to laws like New York’s with serious privacy issues and that are pretty much unworkable by any open source projects

And also a lot to think about in terms of why educating parents is ineffective and the nature of the societal problems motivating these laws and how to address them in the real world with actual parents

@erincandescent "working to ensure legal compliance" is the problem though. no one should be complying at all.
@trwnh if i were a person shipping a distro to users in California from the 1st Jan next year, I'd be asking who's going to pay my legal fees...
@erincandescent assuming the distro has a legal entity that california etc can sue? sure, maybe in that case. i don't envy being system76 headquartered in colorado, but i also am not using pop os. for a community project like arch, i am not sure how feasible it is for us states to sue some guy in germany or prevent the distribution of linux isos.
@trwnh as a person not in the US and with no intention to travel I'd personally feel fairly comfortable, but I might worry about mirror operators