justsoup 
f_ 🇵🇸@justsoup I never said it did, more that it really is a shame..
apparently from my cursory looking (please don't quote me on that) they mainly only use LLMs for code reviews ........ already bad in itself :/
I suspect they generate code now too or will do so in the future.
apparently from my cursory looking (please don't quote me on that) they mainly only use LLMs for code reviews ........ already bad in itself :/
I suspect they generate code now too or will do so in the future.
@fun They do allow AI-generated content if it is "explicitly stated" that they used AI, since we all know how well that works.
For example, this commit was partially drafted using the Claude model
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/58246e64082eadb0df77d0c7c4ca29e7b2b40ed5
ci: Add automatic review thread resolution to claude-review workflow · systemd/systemd@58246e6
Claude now identifies which existing review comment threads should be resolved (because the issue was addressed or someone disagreed) and returns their REST API IDs in a new `resolve` array in the ...
@justsoup oh of course
all this makes me a lot more reluctant about switching to systemd on my host really
all this makes me a lot more reluctant about switching to systemd on my host really
@fun systemd is genuinely a very good software suite that has a lot going for it, don't let one bad decision (that could be worse honestly. Imagine if they did reviews with no human input like some projects) ruin all its good for you. Its like Linux. If they allow the usage of LLMs in their project, then its their problem when the CVEs start rolling in. We'll have to clean up their mess, but if they keep making one, people will eventually get tired of their antics.