#Question: where is the line between a #walk and a #hike? Is it the distance? Or the time spent? Or the rucksack?!

#walking #hiking

A friend of mine told me, it’s a hike if you have a break to rest and eat.

Which is great, because it means the short walk down the road to the nearest chippy is a hike. 😁

@proedie I'd say it's a combination of distance, time spent, and terrain. And I'd say a hike takes more energy than a walk.
@livho And where is the line exactly?
@proedie @livho when you no longer feel like you should "just" bring your non-hiker friends 😆

@proedie

A hike is never paved.

@proedie It's a hike if you took a tent

@proedie this might be a Southern California distinction, with hills and mountains available, but I think the difference is usually elevation gain.

That said, I've been on DTLA "urban hikes" where good fun was had by all.

@buckfiftyseven I would rule out elevation gain, because there’s mudflat hiking which is, well, flat.

@proedie mud! That would require rain, something we have little experience with.

(Actually it's sad, even state parks will close for a quarter inch of rain out here. I guess they don't want the blemish of footprints.)

@buckfiftyseven Oh, nonono! The mudflats are the tidal flats of the North Sea. You basically walk on the bottom of the sea. It’s a bit eerie, because you know you’d be three metres under water if you’d stay here until high tide. You really have to keep an eye on the time!
@proedie we don't have such tides either :-(. Deprived.
@buckfiftyseven There’s actually a Wikipedia article about it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mudflat_hiking
Mudflat hiking - Wikipedia

@buckfiftyseven So, your next holiday will be in Europe then? 😁

@proedie I think you could get as many answers as there are walkers and hikers.

For me:

Walk: Might be in town, parks and/or in nature; on asphalt/tarmac, gravel roads or paths; maximum 2 hours long, no backpack, no equipment, casual clothes.

Hike: Always in nature, on paths and/or gravel roads, usually follows an established hiking route, always bringing at least some equipment and food in a backpack, hiking clothes for maximum movement and less transpiration, 3+ hours long.

@proedie Oh, and a walk could have a different purpose - to get somewhere, to pluck mushrooms, to exercise the dog.

A hike is a hike, and you hike it for the hike - including the nature experience, the views, the sounds, the air. You might pick mushrooms if you find any, but you are there to hike.

@proedie
Let me #qwant this for you:

https://www.qwant.com/?q=where+is+the+line+between+a+%23walk+and+a+%23hike%3F&t=web

It seems the intent, duration and intensity.
I wasn't sure myself to be honest. 😀

nextcloud dla firm – Qwant Search

Fast, reliable answers and still in trust: Qwant does not store your search data, does not sell your personal data and is hosted in Europe.

Qwant

@hikingdude Oh, no! I’m looking for the fediverse’s opinion.

🥺
👉👈

@proedie
Ahhhhh okaay., sorry.
Yeah to me it's the time and 🤔 intent.

I just remember a friend who once said during a conversation about my hikes "yeah sure... Because everything shorter than 4h is just going for a walk"
(just because my hikes are usually longer)

But that's maybe not a proper definition 😉

@proedie For me it's the backpack. I used to go on 10-15 mile "walks" diverting along the way to places where I could buy drinks. Once I started carrying everything to be self-sufficient, those same routes became hikes.

Silly, I know. It's the feeling.

@proedie

For me it's mostly whether I am carrying a pack. On a hike I need to be prepared for unexpected things, carry water, etc. A walk implies that I don't need to worry about such things.

So I guess that self-sufficiency is the key distinction.

@proedie @hikingdude Difficulty, which can be a combination of terrain type, elevation change, and distance. A 2-mile walk in the woods with little elevation change is not a hike.