There's a winning strategy in iterated games theory (I think).

1. Never strike first
2. Tit for tat escalation. Each time the opponent attacks, attack back
3. Immediately back down when the opponent backs down
4. Offer negotiation at every stage

This looks like what Iran is doing. The problem arises when the initial aggressor thinks they are all powerful and believes they have an undeniable right to win.

Flaming Cheeto (@[email protected])

The trouble is if DJT decided to stop attacking and see if Iran would stop in response, there's no guarantee that Bibi would stop. He can lob a grenade anytime he wants and restart the exchanges.

Mastodon