Ok, the PR doesn't seem terrible? The topic is touchy as hell and putting political pressure against the entire age-checking effort is absolutely necessary, but on technical grounds this implementation does the two things I'd absolutely want here: allowing the user to unilaterally set whatever value they want, including none at all, and disallowing applications from reading that value without the user's permission.

So very much a design that superficially ticks the compliance checkbox while pointedly laying out its implementation in the shape of the letters F U C K Y O U.

Mind you, loud non-compliance also has value and I'm glad some are taking that road. But we need both IMO.

https://social.treehouse.systems/@wwahammy/116264430375745593