Mastodawn

My first instaban for #slop PR to #Gentoo.

Normally, we warn people first, but here it's clearly an untested (and obviously broken) slop contribution by non-Gentoo user trying to push their software all over the place.

https://github.com/gentoo/guru/pull/450

#NoAI #NoLLM

app-misc/tangi: add Tangi local AI assistant with RAG by mreinrt · Pull Request #450 · gentoo/guru

Add Tangi - hardware-aware local AI assistant with RAG for codebases This PR adds: app-misc/tangi: Tangi v1.0.0 dev-python/llama-cpp-python: 0.3.16 (with OpenBLAS support) Tangi is a local AI ass...

GitHub

Show thread

Alexey Skobkin Mar 21

@mgorny
As an over a decade Gentoo user who actively uses LLMs I'm just sad.

I'm not against rejecting broken contributions (that's the only sane choice), but that wasn't about it.

That makes me feel unwelcome. Not this post which clarifies reasoning, but that PR you linked to.

And no, I'm not expecting to change your mind. Just feedback.

Show thread

LinuxUserGD

Mar 21

@skobkin @mgorny
It's still a slop contribution, e. g. copyright from 2025 and `export CMAKE_ARGS` instead of `local mycmakeargs`

https://github.com/mreinrt/Tangi/commits/Tangi/

Show thread

Alexey Skobkin Mar 21

@HugeGameArtGD
That wasn't stated reason of the ban.

Show thread

LinuxUserGD

@skobkin
In theory it could be a false positive, e. g. the author could have been using an ebuild template from an outdated wiki page.
But since the PR is proposing an ebuild for his own project which was created yesterday, this is probably very unlikely the case (no pun intended).