"i prompted an output from the machine that outputs crazy bullshit with no basis in reality and what happened next will shock you"

grandpa no!

drives me insane when even supposedly ai skeptics act as if there is any factual value to the stuff that comes out of Claude or whatever. has anyone considered carefully baiting Claude into confessing to a bunch of unsolved murders? We could close so many cases this way
the narrative has been controlled so much by AI boosters that even the people who are publicly skeptical of it appear to be operating from the default position that AI is powerful/effective/truthful/deterministic and then just trying to argue the morals, when a much bigger problem is that AI is probabilistic, but that's not one we can easily assign morals to unless we start deliberately twisting it into "the AI... is DISHONEST!"
@lucky Mind if I boost?
@IvanDSM you are very welcome to, thanks :)