Evgeniy LatuhinMar 20
I am slightly dishearted seeing that 70% of code committers in my org are using "AI assisted code completion". But then again for some year same org mandated that 70% of people should make a commits, without any regards if their role actually demand this or not.
I am mainly concerned that this shovelware will flow in production environments in bigger amounts. And the moment it will impact infra it would be mine problem, cause infra is shared.
Show threadEvgeniy LatuhinMar 20
I am doing anything that can help to squash the shovelware process? Not really. The email draft about why I think using AI in the org "is bad actually", that I need to share with my manager and so on, is still draft in my inbox.
The reading of internal policy on AI tools didn't bring a good anti enforcement method.
My anti AI advocacy is also just telling people that it is bad and waiting when they got back to me with same.
Show threadEvgeniy Latuhin
I am in the picture: "For AI to prevail only require for the good people to do nothing" and I don't like it.
Mar 20 at 10:35amPhanpy
Show threadEvgeniy LatuhinMar 20
As with all structural problems ... ( And I am considering the slop acceptance to be a structural problems, and also workers agency and rights problem. ) ... organising is the key. And I need to start organising against this somehow.