The more that I have tried to personally formalize my own feelings about LLMs (because I am anticipating having to have some extremely stressful conversations around their use in data journalism over the next few years), the more I keep thinking the word that best describes them is "corrosive."

The knowledge commons gets eroded, laundered, and spammed. Users' skills atrophy, along with their critical thinking. Labor is undermined. It may not be inherent to the tech itself, but the effect of all current implementations is to weaken the integrity of whatever they come in contact with.

Heather Bryant (@hbcompass.bsky.social)

If a thing is so incredible and valuable because it eliminates the burden of people needing to skill up or get up to speed in order to do something, then it cannot also be a thing in which not using it right away would cause someone to be "left behind". Those are mutually exclusive characteristics.

Bluesky Social
@ryan Yeah, in much the same way that its advocates seem to think that the solution for all LLM problems is more LLM, it's very clear that over time they've become convinced that "talking to the chatbot" is not only a valuable skill, but is the only skill they recognize.