Aella's Influence on Rationalist Kink Practices (cursed phrase)

https://awful.systems/post/7630417

Aella's Influence on Rationalist Kink Practices (cursed phrase) - awful.systems

The essay by Noelle Perdue [https://noelleperdue.substack.com/p/dying-losers] has some blind spots but she was struck by one of their kink practices: > The wider network of Effectively Altruistic, Bay Area AI tech brotherhood has been covered on and off- in varying degrees of concern- for their seemingly wide community interest in kink, BDSM and “Consensual Non-Consent,” aka rape play. I experienced this myself, sitting in a circle of self-identified rationalists as they explained to me the pleasures of “red means no” parties; full-contact “rape orgies” where participants are encouraged to fight back. Scott Alexander and Scott Aaronson mostly want a woman to produce and raise babies. Gwern does not seem to post much about sexuality. Kelsey Piper probably keeps that to Tumblr and Project Lawful although she is queer and polyamorous. Yudkowsky is into dominance, sadism, and horny Japanese pop culture. Brent Dill liked master/slave relationships with much younger women which are a kind of consensual non-consent. Polyamory is big in this subculture. I don’t know much about Burning Man culture. But I can’t recall anyone in Bay Area rationalism and EA expressing interest in rape parties until Aella showed up. So is this like Yudkowsky spreading AI doomerism, and Alexander spreading neoreaction? There is a difference between old school SoCal kink, where you spend a lot of time making fursuits and paddles and occasionally use them with someone fetching, and Aella’s version where you rent a house or a field and go to town on each other. The Rationalists don’t like the protective measures which kinksters have learned from experience, like limiting or banning substance use, safewords, and joining a national or international kink community so you can get a second opinion about that proposition on FetLife. (Yudkowsky keeps posting “of course I use safewords, but what if I didn’t” and I have seen a claim [https://archive.ph/SFCwS] that the rape parties involve games like drugs roulette). Many of them are hostile to mainstream ideas of informed consent, preferring a Libertarian approach where if you sign a contract what happens after is your responsibility.

Waitwaitwait

I just learned these people aren’t talking about Computer Numerical Control

Pass the brain bleach pls

Computer-Numerical Control controlled Consensual-Non-Consensual sex, for max brain damage
Is there an open-source standard for that yet?

standard

non consensual

Not sure we can combine that.

CNC is (ideally, without roofie roulette and a ton of social pressure to perform involved) consensual, just simulating non-consent, and there are already some interesting API standards out there for relevant haptic devices…
Ow yes, I know, I’m not dragging on CNC (which imho if properly executed also has limits, the dominant party isn’t suddenly allowed to get into cutting after they watched a slasher movie if that wasn’t part of an agreement for example). And I think you can already do that in part with the lovesense stuff, if people agree to 24/h them. (Not sure about the batterylife of those things then whoever).
Well, for CNC you’d likely want some way to program and upload looping movement patterns to an off-the-shelf controller, for CNC you’d want devices to negotiate and establish a safeword when they connect to the network, and for C&C you could patch OpenRA to call the API at appropriate (?) times. That’s why I think a 15th competing standard is needed here.
Gonna Make You Sweat (Everybody Dance Now) (Official HD Video)

YouTube