Blacksky has already built their own ATProto stack that's fully independent from Bluesky.

Now Eurosky is making progress as they roll out their own PDS.

I see more independent infrastructure springing up on https://atp.fyi/network, including AppViews.

For anyone hoping that we'll get another wave of people coming to the fediverse once Bluesky folds/enshittifies, that might not necessarily be the case as people will have more options to stay in the Atmosphere.

#fediverse #atmosphere #ATProto #bluesky #SocialMedia

Bluesky network map

@stefan I like that things are becoming more federated. What makes me a bit sad is that we still can't all be online using the same protocol. But then again, that's nothing new, people have always been spread across different platforms anyway, Tumblr, Facebook, Twitter... without being able to communicate with each other.

@rolle I guess if the fediverse keeps pushing people away, and ATProto gains wide enough adoption, and it becomes easy to run your whole stack, I might just look into that.

Until then, I'll have to stick with the fediverse, as that's the only truly grassroots option.

@stefan @rolle

I just don't get the whole "fediverse pushing people away" angle, at all. Care to elaborate?

There are millions of users and thousands of servers on the fediverse. All kinds of people, from all over the world. It's not one homogenous mass "pushing people away" or "being unwelcoming". You just couldn't make that happen even if you tried.

@pahoittelemme Are you thinking of millions of inactive users?

https://fedidb.com

https://mastodon-analytics.com

The hostility, particularly towards Black people has been well documented.

https://logicmag.io/policy/blackness-in-the-fediverse-a-conversation-with-marcia-x/

https://privacy.thenexus.today/start-making-the-fediverse-less-toxic/

Every few days there is a woman talking about the sexism on here. Seems really hard to miss this stuff.

@rolle

fedidb.com - Informationen zum Thema fedidb.

fedidb.com ist die beste Quelle für alle Informationen die Sie suchen. Von allgemeinen Themen bis hin zu speziellen Sachverhalten, finden Sie auf fedidb.com alles. Wir hoffen, dass Sie hier das Gesuchte finden!

@stefan @rolle

We're probably speaking past each other.

The fediverse still isn't some homogenous blob where what you said applies universally. It's all down to individual instances and their moderators.

Granted, the largest instances probably have the worst time dealing with moderation.

But I have a hard time seeing @rolle walk past bad behaviour on the instance he runs, ditto for the org that runs my instance.

@pahoittelemme A lot of the problematic behavior is insidious, though.

Asking Black people to prove there is racism. Asking women to "just block" every single individual harasser. Telling people to "just" stop using Big Tech products. To add alt text. Not acknowledging some of the good things they're already doing and demanding perfection. Tone policing. Demanding very specific use of CWs.

All of these people are just trying to be helpful, right? Not really breaking any "rules".

@rolle

@pahoittelemme Kind of a moot point. Bluesky has people. Twitter has people. So why do so few people want to be here?

You can't just attribute this to bad UX. People on Bluesky complain about not being able to edit posts, create private accounts, blocks being public, all kinds of UX problems.

It's not even an issue of having to pick a server, look at all the people who figured out that part, and now they're gone.

https://mastodon-analytics.com

Some will say that fediverse is "too complicated", but we've seen people install VPNs to get around TikTok bans and age restrictions, and now they're talking about migrating between PDSes and AppViews on Bluesky.

It's the culture here.

@rolle

Mastodon Analytics

How many users, active users, servers are on Mastodon?

Mastodon Analytics

@stefan @pahoittelemme @rolle I don’t see an issue with the culture here, fedi admins do a great job of having instances talk to one another blocking the bad ones but you will get some bad eggs on any server which is unavoidable unfortunately.

That’s why we have block and report tools for those bad eggs.

@Justin Crozer @Stefan Bohacek @Lentävä Kalakukko @Roni Rolle Laukkarinen Whenever I see Mastodon users talk about "culture" in a Fediverse context, I have to wonder: What exactly do they refer to when they talk about "culture"?

Is it Fediverse culture? As in, overarching, software-independent Fediverse culture?

As in, taking into consideration that Fediverse server applications that aren't Mastodon, e.g. Misskey or Sharkey or Friendica or Hubzilla, have different cultures than Mastodon?

Recognising a post or a comment from one of these applications, acknowledging that it comes from a place with a different history, a different set of features and thus a different culture than Mastodon and refraining from enforcing Mastodon's unwritten rules against it?

Or does "culture" only refer to Mastodon's culture? Does it reject or completely disregard all cultures in the Fediverse that aren't Mastodon's and demand the whole Fediverse adopt Mastodon's culture and only Mastodon's culture?

Do these "bad eggs" include users who post more than 500 characters at once (which, by the way, is perfectly normal everywhere outside of Mastodon)?

Do these "bad eggs" include users who reply to people who haven't mentioned them first, and whom they aren't mutually following either (which, by the way, is perfectly normal in large parts of the non-Mastodon Fediverse, too)?

Do these "bad eggs" include users who quote-post Mastodon toots that must not be quote-posted (because they've had quote-posts for much longer than Mastodon, but without a no-quote flag so they can't see Mastodon's no-quote flag)?

Do these "bad eggs" incllude users who "misuse" Mastodon's CW field for summaries (because they have literally had the exact same text field as a summary field for seven years longer than Mastodon has had it as a CW field, and because having a summary field makes a whole lot of sense if your character limit is not 500, but over 16.7 million)?

Do these "bad eggs" include users who use more than four hashtags in one post (because, unlike Mastodon, the places where they are have filtering as well as automatically having messages hidden behind CW buttons deeply engrained into their cultures, but this requires the appropriate keywords to be present)?

If so, then this explains why only Mastodon users can enjoy significant reach on Mastodon: Everyone else is mass-blocked for misbehaving by Mastodon's standards.

#Long #LongPost #CWLong #CWLongPost #FediMeta #FediverseMeta #CWFediMeta #CWFediverseMeta #QuotePost #QuotePosts #QuoteTweet #QuoteTweets #QuoteToot #QuoteToots #QuoteBoost #QuoteBoosts #QuotedShares #QuotePostDebate #QuoteTootDebate #CW #CWs #CWMeta #ContentWarning #ContentWarnings #ContentWarningMeta #CharacterLimit #CharacterLimits #CharacterLimitMeta #CWCharacterLimitMeta #Fediverse #Mastodon #NotOnlyMastodon #FediverseIsNotMastodon #MastodonIsNotTheFediverse #MastodonCulture #MastodonCentricity #MastodonNormativity
Netzgemeinde/Hubzilla

@jupiter_rowland let’s clear this up for you.

Bad eggs — people who are terrible people like antisemites, nazis, transphobes, racists etc…

Mastodon culture — genuinely people on most instances are good people who are able to have intellectual conversations unless they fall under the bad egg banner.

Also a side point about over 500 characters that’s instance specific and isn’t a thing freely available across all platforms X for instance locks it behind a paywall.