Anon owns nothing and is unhappy

https://sh.itjust.works/post/56990200

Cross out ā€œof PC gamingā€ and you got it.
OP is wrong about one thing: They’re not happy.
At least we’ll always have the classics. Download, play, and seed emulated games folks.
not when your computer goes to the cloud.

When’s the last time you tried to emulate something? The Wii and PSP can handle up to N64 decently, and that hardware is going on 20 years old.

Depending on your phone you can emulate PS2 and even Switch games.

Just hold on to whatever you have, even phones, and emulator devs will figure out the rest. Accuracy has been king for a long time while we’ve had strong hardware availability, but there’s no reason we can’t do per game speed hacks again like old SNES emulators when hardware gets scarce.

my main worry is that these things aren’t built to last.

yeah if they switched everyone to the cloud right now, i’d have a decade of computer, maybe a bit more if i can fix it’s boards, and then what?

consoles tend to last longer but they don’t do general computing, which is an important thing we’d be losing in the process.

Phones degrade through daily use as the charging port wears out or it gets dropped and damaged. Beyond that, software update assume more resources because they’re tuned to new models that have that. If new models don’t, we’ll see that change.

The only part with a real use before date in it is batteries, but you can use them plugged in. Capacitors too, technically, but we’re long past the days of the capacitor plague. Most should hold up for decades, as far as I’m aware.

As far as what we do a decade down the line?

I’d be shocked if business trends don’t shift back to owned hardware which will in turn revitalize the consumer market. They’ll take the functional parts that don’t pass QC for business use and rebrand them for comsumers. They’ve been doing that with tons of hardware for ages now. The ram chips don’t hit the right clock speed for the premium product so they’ll bin those ones together into a lower grade cheaper product instead of trashing them entirely.

In a lot of ways this is just another go around of mainframe and terminals vs personal computers again. So we had the mainframe in the cloud vs on-prem setup, and various companies fell on either side based on their needs by now. Cloud is fairly stable, and we’re at the point that most companies are able to evaluate pros and cons in a more clear headed manner. Most are discoverign that it makes sense to keep some things on-prem.

So now we get another go-around due to hardware scarcity because of AI hype. We’re already seeing news stories talking about the importance of having actual metrics to judge success of ā€œAI-enhancedā€ 🤮 workflows. Companies can stay irrational longer than we’d like, but they can’t do it indefinitely.

Enough companies have enough legitimate use cases (and cash to burn) that on-premises hardware isn’t going to just die. Eventually that will trickle back down to consumers.

And if it somehow doesn’t, people will continue to figure out how to keep older stuff running. There has always been specialists doing it, now there will be more due to more demand.

I’m not really seeing where there’s a lack of compute power in citizen hands that can’t be overcome with more resource aware programming techniques, which will also start coming back into vogue if it has to.

There’s no point (financially or open-source wise) making software no one can run. People will adapt.

I’m not trying to say that it won’t suck, and that we aren’t likely to see some big changes coming. I just can’t imagine a future in which we all don’t adapt and keep moving forward.

The only way everything goes into unsalvagable shit is if people just wholesale stop trying, and that’s not something I’ve seen people just give up and do as some mass homogenous group in my life.

i like the optimism and really hope you are right, but there has been a very deliberate trend to strip us of ownership, and the powers that be seem very serious about it (think uber instead of car ownership, netflix and game streaming instead of media ownership, renting instead of home ownership) as capitalism concentrates wealth.

and with the ubiquitous internet infrastructure we have now, centralizing computing is easier than ever when all they really care about is that we are able to do our button pressing work.

i really do hope they come up with a way to fix silicon. because stuff like motherboards can already be easily repaired with mostly off the shelf components, but silicon gets… complicated to say the least, and it’s at the center of our current bottleneck. or that used server hardware isn’t somehow efused, encrypted or otherwise made nonviable or too hard for consumers to reuse.

there is some hope for some other potentially capable player like china and their shiny new semiconductor industry or russia can step in and offer alternatives to enshitified us tech as they wedge themselves into the global market, but that gets difficult with import controls that would certainly be put in place to stop them from taking hold.

but yeah, the next decade or two will see some muddying of these waters as the war season picks up, cooperation shuts down and resources get scarce as they are redirected to murder.

i will go as far as to say the big changes you allude to are already in the pipeline and IDing everyone on the internet and pushing cloud is just the beginning.

A decade from now, either we’ll be subjugated by AI drones and gaming is the least of our concerns, or the AI bubble and/or capitalism will have collapsed and the market will be flooded with data center hardware that can be adapted into PCs at scale.

Steam Deck runs everything up to a PS3 and Xbox 360, and the Switch.

Almost everything a generation prior to ran runs with 0 problems, PS3/360/Switch can be hit or miss somewhat, depending on the game.

Seeing shit get worse and worse every year has thr goblinest mask of all callin’ like:

I think the ā€œpatient gamerā€ model could be the way through don’t buy new shit and encourage your friends to play older games too. Hardware can be not great and the games are cheap.
How long is that going to work though? Today’s slop is not going to unslop in 5 years, and it seems like every big name game publisher is exclusively doing slop now. Especially the optimization issue won’t go away, and it looks like the times where you could just wait for a generation or two of more powerful hardware are over, too - hardware might be getting more powerful, but the performance per dollar isn’t improving because the performance is only improving incrementally and the prices are getting higher and higher.

it seems like every big name game publisher is exclusively doing slop now.

You have to understand the capitalism, it is doing slop because slop is what sells to people

You will need to shift your monies away from big name game publishers to smaller ones that make content that you prefer thereby encouraging them to make more non-slop

But I’ve been saying it for years even before AI, call of duty 29 and fifa 56 etc are all cash cows

There is no incentive to improve if what you’re doing works

Still plenty of indie devs making good games. Really, you could just work through all the good games made up to this point and be fine for the rest of your life.

Otoh, if what you really care about is the social connection you get from playing games and talking about them with other people, you can just take up gardening or community service or pole dancing to get that.

I have enough unplayed games for years. And I haven’t even bought all games that interest me on my wishlist.

So to answer your question: I think it will work long enough till AI either implodes or is big enough that the state forces you to connect your brain implant to it.

Which games are slop nowadays?
We’ll just mod the old games.

Theoretically, we could see the PC gaming market come to resemble that of eastern Europe in the past, where everybody has very minimal or outdated hardware and the indie scene builds games with this in mind.

That’s pretty dire, but I prefer it over cloud subscriptions becoming the norm for gaming and other compute heavy tasks.

There are options that don’t involve buying. Open source games exist.
I’m talking about the hardware. ā€œnot buyingā€ that and getting away with it is quite a bit harder than for software.
Cheaper hardware also exists, raspberry pi can run loads of games. Could even run old flash games on it.
Pis (Pi’s? Pi-s?) are cool, but it seems like overkill in this case. A second-hand thinkpad should be accessible enough, both cost-wise and difficulty-wise.
Yeah that also works. Still want to make a briefcase pi some day. Power everything by USB and stick a few powerbanks in there so it would run for days. It’s also easier to fix any broken part compared to a laptop. Made with some padding and it should be reasonably impact resistant too.
Oh yeah, that sounds awesome. Kinda like something out of a spy movie or something.
That only works if you already own the hardware and/or the majority does NOT do that model. The moment most people jump on board, the cost of old hardware will skyrocket too.

Except even if the majority DOES adopt this model:

  • that will make repairing old hardware more profitable, so supply will rise to meet demand at least a bit (and is also objectively a good thing)
  • a lot of old hardware isn’t compatible with Win11+ and unless Microsoft is visited by the Three Ghosts of Software or the long-anticipated Year Of The Linux Desktop arrives, so that’s one moat you can take advantage of (I assume you, a Lemmy user, are more likely to try Linux than an average person would, or are using it already)
  • if the price still goes up, manufacturers will step in to take advantage
  • at some point, the new slop business model won’t have enough customers to sustain itself
If you buy them off Steam you don’t actually own the game. You own a license to play the game, and that license is non-transferable and can be revoked. Doesn’t matter if it’s on your hard drive.

Reject modernity.

Embrace tradition.

Trying to get into MUDs - any suggestions? - Lemmy.World

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/60915972 [https://lemmy.ca/post/60915972] > Hey folks, > > just in the last few days I’ve really become very interested (probably one of those ADHD micro-obsessions) with trying to play a MUD or MUSH. I’m a long-time tabletop RPG GM, and I’ve been diving into retro games lately. It feels like it should be right up my alley! > > That said, I haven’t had a great experience with my first little foray. I’ve had some software issues accessing some of them, and others are simply dead. It sounds like Gemstone IV is super popular, but I don’t want to jump into a neutered experience (and I certainly don’t want to pay to play from the outset!). > > I’m hoping to try a few more, but it would be great if anyone has: > (a) specific ones that they think are still great, so that I can feel more sure that it’s worth the trouble of getting set up on and used to a specific MUD. > (b) advice about getting started! > > Thanks for any input! =)

August will mark 10 years of playing Rimworld for me.

Obv its not the only thing I play, but I come back to it every 3-4 months after little breaks. Was the same for Mount and Blade till the sequel came out. The sequel was both such an upgrade and such a downgrade it made it hard to keep interest. It’s been probably 2 years since I booted that up. Maybe I should give it another try.

Downgrade? I’m curious what you didn’t like about the sequel. Was it the family/diplomacy/story being too in your face? I think that was my only real gripe, but not a big one because it was interesting and easily removed if I wanted with mods.
That was an aspect, but I think it was how much dumber the AI became. I remember the ā€œconquer everythingā€ objective being doable in the first base game, but your allies act so poorly in the sequel that its basically in doable.
Oh, aye, I can see that. I personally hated the whole, ā€˜let a noble go and he suddenly respawns with an army’ thing, so I just started executing everyone once I had a good army and the skills to maintain it myself. I didn’t have to worry about allies once everyone hated me.

The sequel was both such an upgrade and such a downgrade

How is the sequel a downgrade? (I don’t know basically anything except playing one of the games for half an hour-ish)

Graphics was in DIRE need of an update on original Mount And Blade. Game came out in ~2010, but the graphics felt like they were early 2000’s.

Sequel did an 8/10 job on bringing those up to the late 2010’s (despite its ~2022 release).

That said, the base game became unwinnable with how impossibly stupid the game AI became. They also tried to build in a ā€œmain storyā€ which was busted in multiple fronts and virtually impossible if you ever experienced a party wipe (very common occurrence in the early game).

Even with cheats enabled, my best run at the sequel’s primary objective (conquer the map), I only ever got ~25% of the way there after over 200 hours of game play.

Stay strong there is hope. TES VI is in the making.
It’s way better than "you will have a big car, a big house, an fat wife and a dog "
oh no, not home ownership and pets

Lmao you think that’s happiness? Owning stuff?

I pity you

it fucking beats not having control over my home fucking environment
Yes that must be why boomers are so well adjusted and happy in life
Hell, Kristi, did you get so bored after being fired that you found the fediverse?
fires up klondike

Microslop ads intensify

ā€œWe have upgraded your klondike game to be CoPilot Klondike, with more CoPilot enabled features, such as CoPilot and CoPilot 365 for every move!ā€

Uses DOSBOX to run Windows 3.1 to play Solitare Vegas Mode
It is the grim dark far future of all gaming. Forget the promise of freedom to upgrade and superior graphical fidelity. There is no peace among the Discord servers, only an eternity of monetization, and micro transactions.
When companies stopped being able to actually make anything new, they then choose to find new ways to extract profit from the customer. Far cheaper than expending money on R&D, retooling, etc. They all decided to become landlords of the worst kind, squatting on their tech and extracting rent while ensuring the rest of us own nothing.

Offline games will stay existing, even if the AAA studios won’t create those.

But fuck em.

There’s already more amazing games than you or I could possibly play in a lifetime. If they only make shitty games, I’ll just play old games. I’ve been gaming on a retro handheld and honestly there’s so many amazing games I missed.

Indy devs are also killing it in the multiplayer space with silly and charming co-op experiences. I played a lot of Peak and Motor Town with friends lately and both are just so fun.

I LOVE MOTOR TOWN
It’s such a good game!
I am Impressed with the wheel support. Even on Linux my dfgt worked perfectly and the feedback is better than some dedicated racing games.
When you blamed the SJWs and Anita Sarkeesian.
Did I miss the part where Anita demanded for Bezos to hang?

She did not say that, but I saw things being said like this during gamergate:

I’m bet microtransactions are due to Anita, she probably said something like ā€œdifficult games are sexist, unlocks should be paidā€, then developers followed suit.

Others think horny gachaslop with decent-ish gameplay at first invalidates the argument, that microtransactions are bad.

Where did it all go wrong?

When we stopped publicly executing politicians and millionaires (there were no billionaires yet at the time).

Elon Musk is on the path to become a trillionaire.