RE: https://beepboop.one/@Alexis/115996498846346328

#MovieThread VII: The Kino Awakens, Chapter Three — March Edition

From 2020 to 2025 I watched 2370 movies.
In 2026 so far I've watched another 70, for a total of 2440 movies.

This month:
* John McTiernan.
* Ninja Turtles, probably.

 Previous thread:

Starting John McTiernan, it's the movie "Nomadland" is not a sequel to, it's —

#71, or #2441, 1986's "Nomads."

It's the movie today best remembered for the "Seinfeld" episode of the same title where Elaine is the only person in town who hates it, leaving now for a screening of —

#72, or #2442, 1996's "The English Patient."

With this one I'm 8/10 for seeing this year's Best Picture nominees in the cinema, leaving now to go see —

#73, or #2443, 2026's "Sentimental Value."

With and after dinner, watched —

#74, or #2443, 2026 Netflix doc “Queen of Chess.”

Interesting story about a woman I knew nothing about. But it’s a shame it has to tell her story by focusing on her rivalry with a man. Do enjoy watching her crush these dudes, though, obviously.

As I understand it, this Brazilian Best Picture nominee is not about a secret agent, leaving now to go see —

#75, or #2445, 2026's "O Agente Secreto," or, "The Secret Agent."

It's the "Star Trek" movie that dares to ask, what if the "Star Trek" movies had a cast that actually liked being in the same room as each other, it's —

#76, or #2446, 1994's "Star Trek Generations."

#startrek #tng

The only one of this year's slate of Best Picture nominees I have to watch at home instead of in the cinema, it's —

#77, or #2447, 2025's "Train Dreams."

The conversation about this one has collapsed into "boy, they really whiffed it on this one," but that means there's a chance I can be contrarian just by having a good time, so, you know, still gotta see it, leaving now to go see —

#78, or #2448, 2026's "The Bride!"

Meant to go see this true story Tourette's drama before it became unexpectedly topical but never got around to it until what's probably the last screening, leaving now to go see —

#79, or #2449, 2026's "I Swear."

Yesterday was Pie Day. On a related note, it's —

#80, or #2450, 1999's "American Pie."

The Pursuit of Purple March? No. The Chase for Burnt Sienna November? Absolutely not. It's —

#81, or #2451, 1990 John McTiernan picture "The Hunt for Red October."

Used to be all you needed for a Best Picture nominee was two guys and a chain gang for them to escape from, it's —

#82, or #2452, 1958's "The Defiant Ones."

From how everyone talks about this one it's one of those message pictures that tries to solve racism forever — the two guys are Tony Curtis and Sidney Poitier, and they gotta get along to thrive post-escape even though their ancestors are from different continents, can you imagine — which I'm sure has aged just delightfully.

"How come they chained a white man to a black?"
"Warden's got a sense of humour."

tell that warden that if he's gonna quit his day job it should be out of protest against the american prison industrial complex and not to try and make a career as a comedian happen

I would simply not be in a chain gang in the first place.

On account of I don't think those were ever really a thing here, but also even America, Land of the Chain Gangs, had basically stopped doing chain gangs by the late 1950s, so how would I end up in a chaing gang.

Now, I can see myself being a fugitive from the law, but I assure you, whatever I did, either I didn't do it or it wasn't wrong of me to do.

These are some beautiful central performances, honestly.

For how bare the premise is, and for how much I expected this to have aged inelegantly — being a sensible person who obviously abhors all racism, an old message picture about how racism is bad can sometimes be a little like throwing a candle at a campfire — this is honestly kind of beautiful. Everything here really works, and Poitier and Curtis are just doing all-timer work.

It doesn’t just have its heart in the right place, it’s got its actual movie in the right place, too. Holds up!

@Alexis It really is, I think, in the leads giving some of their best-ever work that keeps it effective.
@naga They both have clear arcs that they communicate deeply well through lived-in-feeling characters that never betray who they seem like they should be to get the message across. Great movie.

Ths seems like a movie for a yawny Wednesday where I'm not gonna do anything else, I understand it to be about Sean Connery doing doctor science in the jungle, but the title sure is a bit of a red flag, it's —

#83, or #2453, 1992 John McTiernan picture "Medicine Man."

Lorraine Bracco has been sent to the Amazon to go find Sean Connery, and she's as tough a bird as the time she's havin', as it were.

(Already you can tell this wants to be "Romancing the Stone.")

You don't get a lot of movies these days where the main character is introduced by them just being a massive, honking dickwad of a misogynist to their co-lead, do you.

*points at the "massive cultural change is completely possible, it just takes ten years to do it and another ten to get used to it" sign*

"You send me back on the basis of my gender. It's called sex discrimination."

ah it's a message picture about how women are people

wait, so he found a cure for cancer, but he can't replicate it?

so he's a genius but an idiot

the Connery character sucks, but it's also not unenjoyable to watch Lorraine Bracco just be absolutely fuming at him about how much he sucks
Might not ever have seen a ziplining scene before that's not, like, about the action of ziplining but about the gentle joy of floating amongst the trees? This is nice.
I appreciate that there's no romance angle to any of this — she's happily engaged to Mr Off-Screen, and he's pretty much married to the work.
Oh, a big swing into environmental concerns for the climax, though I'd argue the Amazon probably shouldn't be demolished regardless of how many medically important flowers it has in it.
Not quite as bad as I expected from the title and general “white people in the jungle” of it all, though it does, of course, have huge issues — the aforementioned “white people in the jungle” of it all, the Connery character just being a raging asshole you’re meant to find charming.

But there’s plenty here I had a good time with — Bracco as a bird as tough as the time she’s havin’, as it were, is just delightful and charming, the score is pretty good, its environmental concerns are solidly timeless.

Excellent ziplining scene, too — not so much about the action of ziplining but a lot more about the gentle joy of getting to float amongst the trees. Lovely.

Hard to say it wouldn’t be improved a thousandfold by the complete excision of the Connery character, though.
@Alexis I remember my parents renting that movie when I was a kid! The zip lining left an impression on me. The sexism did not.
@blue The sexism really does completely get in the way of a lot of what I might otherwise really enjoy already.

@Alexis You'd know better than I -- did that tend to be a message that other movies hadn't cottoned to yet in 1992?

Not necessarily other message pictures, but whether screenwriters hadn't figured that out in large numbers yet.

I'm inclined to think they hadn't...

@naga In mainstream cinema, 1992 is the year of “Aladdin,” “Sister Act,” “A Few Good Men,” “Batman Returns,” but also of “Lethal Weapon 3,” “Wayne’s World,” “Reservoir Dogs” — there’s a trend towards depictions of women as “tough cookie who can hold her own”-types, but they’re almost always somewhat exaggerated Strong Female Characters who exist in the context of narratives that prioritise the perspectives and feelings of strictly cishet men.

@naga In that way, though I do think the Bracco character is more grounded than many of her contemporaries, I'd consider "Medicine Man" essentially fairly representative of films of the time.

(My "ah it's a message picture" line obviously me being a bit silly.)

@Alexis Thanks. Sounds like trending toward "screenwriters know 'women are people'" but not quite there?

@naga Yeah, that feels right — they've clearly seen the old ways don't quite work any more, but they can't quite get their heads out of their own asses yet.

Like, a few years later, in 1995's "GoldenEye," M does call Bond a "sexist, misogynist dinosaur," but the picture does then also feature a woman called "Xenia Onatopp" who's a sexy fighter pilot slash assassin who crushes men to death with her thighs for sexual pleasure.

Progress is a journey, not a step.

@Alexis Oh, yes, I got your comment as silly, it just set me wondering. And yeah, that list in 1992 sounds like what you're describing.

And then Bond was Bond...

You've heard of the first three words you say when it's time to do the seek part of hide-and-seek, now get ready for the next three words, leaving now to go see(k?) —

#84, or #2454, 2026's "Ready or Not 2: Here I Come."

I really liked the first "Ready or Not." "Ready or Not 2: Here I Come" is basically the first "Ready or Not" again, but slightly bigger, because it's a sequel and these things have to escalate. It's been seven years, I think it's totally fine for this to be exactly that.

I enjoy it when the rich bastards explode.

A good time at the movies.

Let's go meet a rock friend in space, leaving now to go see —

#85, or #2455, 2026's "Project Hail Mary."

What a joy!

A blast, a hoot, you’ll laugh, you’ll cry — when the picture wants you to care about the rock, by Eos, you’ll care about the rock!

Living comfortably at the intersection paved for it by "Interstellar," "Arrival," and, obviously, "The Martian" — if you like all three of those movies, you should, uh, frankly, already be seated for this one — 2026’s "Project Hail Mary" is… honestly, probably my favourite movie of the year so far.

This thing — one might say — rocks.

@Alexis I can't believe I very nearly watched a new movie before you

@B One of these days you'll beat me to the cinema just because the Brother's work schedule got in my way.

(You'll have a great time with this, to be clear.)

This is called this in the same way it's called "A Minecraft Movie" — it's just one take on it, there /can/ be other Beautiful Minds, it's —

#86, or #2456, 2001's "A Beautiful Mind."

37-year old Russell Crowe not quite selling 19-year old Princeton freshman, though by gum the man is trying.
Crowe disturbed to learn his roommate is the most immediately annoying man he's ever met (Paul Bettany).

"Mathematics is never going to lead you to a higher truth."

they haven't said what Bettany is at Princeton for yet, but it's definitely literature

I was never much good at Go.
It's the middle of his first year at Princeton and Crowe is baffled to discover that, between not publishing anything and not attending classes, the school feels he hasn't quite made the most of his time there.
Maths-writing sequences are like computer typing sequences — the actual real act itself is NOT exciting, and so it's always only ever gonna look exactly as exciting as how completely bullshit it is.
Damn, a fade to 5 years later, the Pentagon, and it's visually like he's gone to prison.
The Pentagon have brought him in to do A Beautiful Mind things to encrypted enemy communications, which on screen means he stares at big wall panels of numbers that glow and move around in his mind until he sees the Important Numbers.
MIT campus? That's the Arkham Asylum from off "Joker: Folly a Deuce."
Adam Goldberg and Anthony Rapp two absolute lads as his maths pals.
Jennifer Connelly is here as Obviously His Primary Love Interest — you can tell because she's the first woman he's ever been in the same room as that's allowed to be an actual character.

"Professor Nash."

...Ed Harris wasn't there when the door closed.

"He just implanted a radium diode."

hold on, he's reading access codes off an implanted chip in his arm in the 50s? I thought this was a biopic.

Not *every* magazine can be wall-to-wall full of encrypted messages, surely. This is just Pepe Silvia-ing.

"I'm at Harvard, doing the Great Authors Workshop."

knew it, literature-coded man

The spy sections are so conspicuously incongruous with the rest of the otherwise fairly straightforward mathematician biopic that I almost don't wanna say what I think is going on, but: He's hallucinating, right.
@Alexis ...oh! I remember this movie
@B You'd hope so, it's quite memorably odd.
@Alexis *ding* *ding* *ding*
@kurt I mean, look at him.
@Alexis Business major Bettany, Computer Science Bettany, Chemistry Bettany, no, none of that works does it?

@kurt It has to be something one could wax poetic about, but he's too manic for it to be a subtle poetry, the poetry of the subject needs to be fairly obvious, and there needs to be somewhat of a future in it.

Literature, yes. Dance, no. English, yes. History, no. Japanese, yes. Politics, yes, but East European Studies, no.

(Though I /can/ see him as a Chemist.)

@Alexis I couldn't see him as a chemist, I /could/ see history for him, though. But teacher more than student.