vdbmDisclaimer Observatory on European digital sovereignty
In this context:
politico.eu/…/us-congress-judiciary-committee-big…
ExtremeDullardAn article on the dangers of AI and threats to digital sovereignty in Europe published in an Italian newspaper, automatically translated by AI.
Oh the irony…
HumaniusThe term “AI” is vague and used to liberally imo.
When people talk about AI, they generally refer to Large Language Models (LLMs), which is what ChatGPT, Mistral, etc are.
Machine translation is not that. It’s a different approach that has been around in some capacity or another for a long time.
My point wasn’t the flavor of AI used for the translation. It was that the article wasn’t translated by human beings who make a living doing translations - because that job has been more or less obsoleted by machines a long time ago - and it almost certainly wasn’t translated by a European machine translation service.
In other words, the article’s translation itself illustrates the article’s subject matter. That’s the irony.
You just completely ignored his point. A simple calculator is also “a flavor of AI” for you?
“Almost certainly wasn’t translated by a European machine”, how can you be sure of that? Is it only European when it’s done by people?
poVoqThey seem to promote the idea that Europe is behind on AI technology and that with the right type of regulation AI is something desireable. This is the lobby line that AI companies like Anthropic and Mistral have been pushing hard to differentiate themselves from companies like OpenAI, but ultimatly it is the same kind of false AI or bust message that all these companies like to push.