This is a highly unusual turn of events. A Nelson sexual assault trial has been abandoned after a jury exposed their "outdated misconceptions about women and sex."

A pre-trial ruling had been made that the complainant was not to be cross-examined on her sexual experiences or perceived sexual interest in others.

On the second day of the trial the jury asked the judge for clarification about "a belt the complainant had described and how it was attached to her clothing, as well as what shoe size she wore."

Her shoe size! Two hours later they followed up with more pure misogyny.

"How many times had she had sex with a man prior to this situation with Mr [suppressed]?” they asked, followed by, “Her underwear— is it a typical style and colour she wears daily, or only for special occasions?"

I wonder how many older white men were on that jury?

https://www.odt.co.nz/news/national/sex-trial-halted-after-jury-questions-underwear-sexual-history

#NZ #Nelson #Jury

Sex trial halted after jury questions underwear, sexual history

What began as a routine trial quickly veered off course as jurors appeared to fixate on the complainant, her underwear choice and her sexual history.

Otago Daily Times Online News
@BobLefridge
Old white guys being old white guys since forever.
Please direct me to the nearest void so I can scream into it 🤬

Imagine what might have happened if the jury hadn't accidentally exposed its misogyny and outdated beliefs? Those same twelve people would have decided whether the woman deserved it or not.

The mind boggles.

@ThorsdaysChild

@BobLefridge With those types of questions they'd already made up their minds and were looking for an excuse, er sorry, 'proof' to back up their decision. 😤
@BobLefridge I am gonna go out of a limb here and suggest that anyone who asks such questions has deep sexual dysfunction and is not a nice person and will have 'history' of a very unsavoury kind. These questions are not normal nor typical, even for old white men. This person has issues and I pity any woman associated with him.

I agree. It's a long way from normal behaviour. But for the jury to be putting these questions to the judge, the Wally is either the jury foreman or there's more than one of them on the jury.

@paulhellyer