@nina_kali_nina @konstruct @FritzAdalis @lanodan If you all want to look into it critically, feel free, but I wrote a response on it

See: https://social.treehouse.systems/@swags/115914027180419851

I'm _okay_ with everyone doing this whole "blocking Claude" thing, but please don't immediately jump the gun for project maintainers who have had to put up with the bullshit!! We got rid of it, thankfully, but even then, that doesn't mean we just "all magically endorse it" and it kind if slipped in by a single developer who I've since talked to.

The Claude one was a PR leached in by someone, but there were some copilot bits as well. There will be a no AI policy soon, so again, please don't take this as some bizarre last minute damage control... it was an issue well over with but Im now certainly a little topsy that people are gonna keep recycling this discussion :/ and it rubs me the wrong way too.

@swags @konstruct @FritzAdalis @lanodan thanks for the clarification, and thanks for your hard work, too. I appreciate your transparency on this issue.

I hope you can see that in this thread I came to the conclusion you shared in your response - that the PRs were not any kind of AI endorsement and basically either highly experimental or sort of smuggled in to the code base. I imagine it is difficult to do release management for such a large open source project (been there), so it is absolutely understandable that you might not have the throughput to do anything else about it; maybe because it'd come at an expense of other efforts, probably far more important to you at this point.

That being said, seeing "Claude contributed to a repo" is definitely a red flag for some people, so I think this discussion might happen again. :(

Anyhow. Thank you, it's great to see a new release!