It #helps with the #algorithm. But #actually, I #think it's an old #Twitter style of #writing tweets from when its algorithm was less fancy

@eris so it’s a vestigial linguistic structure persisting beyond its relevant context, interesting
What the heck is vestigial about it? And why do you hate it so much? One can find pertinent things through hashtags here, and one can scarcely hope to find them any other way.
well, you can also search for the word itself, no need to hashtag half of the entire post

CC: @[email protected]
Is there something actually wrong with wanting a post to be easier to find on search?
It is #wrong when the #post looks #horrendous like this, #yes.

CC: @[email protected]
Eyes of the beholder? You're telling me that hypertext looks horrendous, basically, with a deliberately tendentious example.
That is what this thread is about? People who post like that? One of us here has a reading comprehension that pisses on the poor

CC: @[email protected]
Uh…hashtags piss on the poor? Could you explain that?
@mxchara @eris I totally get dropping hashtags on the end of a long significant post you want to attract discussion to or something, but why would some random irrelevant reply need to be that easily searched?
I can't answer that, but surely there's no way to implement a mechanism allowing a person to signify, "I would like my post to be more easily found on search," that isn't going to be used badly or nonsensically at times. I think it's an acceptable drawback, a minor nuisance. It just looks silly.
@mxchara @eris and that’s all I was complaining about, not the mechanism of hashtags themself, I don’t know why this argument was necessary 
My apologies. I happen to like that there's some kind of mechanism like hashtagging, and I myself feel like it's in the spirit of the early Internet (which often featured highly hyperlinked hand-coded webpages) so I am keen to defend it.