Effort and talent must be rewarded so that human genius is not extinguished, but always to serve the collective well-being.
#PROUT #HumanGenius #CollectiveWellbeing #socialprogress #incentivesforgood #EconomicEvolution #TalentWithPurpose #SocialJustice
@proutistuniversal I take a slightly different view here. Social justice has nothing to do with ability. But it is also only one element of the kind of world we want to live in. We also want to live in a world where there is plenty for all. Pragmatism is the reason for rewarding behavior (not mere ablity!) that benefits society. It is the very pursuit of the common good that drives this, not some greater value intrinsic to those with particular abilities. Every life already matters to the maximum from the outset, so one cannot matter more than another.
@hosford42 Thx 4 yr comment. We agree that every life matters as much as any other, and are dedicated to building an economy in which everyone thrives. This post's context references philosophies such as communism, in which there was little incentive to work, as everyone was considered 'equal' and individual talents were not rewarded. Our vision: a society where everyone has access to min necessities, there's an ever-diminishing gap between min and max wages, and good work is incentivized.

@proutistuniversal Good to hear! We are largely aligned on this, which is why I chose to follow you. I just wanted to be careful about the implicit messaging.

What is your proposed route to building a system where things actually work this way?

My own view is that a cooperative-based economy is an important piece of the picture. Our economic system, centered as it is on "shareholder value", where shareholders are neither workers nor consumers, is intrinsically extractive, effectively placing a tax on every economic exchange between workers and consumers to benefit a third party -- the very definition of "rent-seeking". This serves to progressively concentrate wealth and power by wresting it from the hands of the common person, and this in turn enables government capture via corruption.

An economy consisting entirely of cooperatives would instead redistribute both wealth and power, while still incentivizing economic contributions through skill-based pay.

@hosford42 Thanks! Agree.. Prout proposes a 3-tier system, in which coops are foregrounded as the backbone of economy. Small-scale family businesses could also be run privately, within limits, + large essential industries run as public utilities. All embedded in a system with minimum-max pay scales, cap on wealth, and local decentralized economy. How to get there? Promote the growth of cooperatives, change narrative on wealth accumulation, organize to build local economic resilience. prout.info

@proutistuniversal I'm curious about the decision to treat large industries as public utilities. It seems like running them as cooperatives already gets us where we need to be.

The family business thing seems straight forward, as well: If its a sole proprietorship, it's a co-op of 1. If it's a family business, that's already a cooperative in some sense, even if they don't call it one.

@proutistuniversal

I'm also curious to hear your opinion on worker vs consumer vs hybrid cooperatives. There are cases where each makes more sense, and it comes down to who are the natural stakeholders.