Addisongod dammit. anyone have good #zola alternatives? I just saw the .claude folder... I can probably just pin to a version before the slop, though.
meek cynics@addison, what features do you need?
@[email protected] Mostly just the templating and RSS generation, without the insanity of the Hugo language. For now, just pinning to old Zola is still okay.
Just asking for clarification to make it easier for others to answer, @addison, I've no suggestion myself (writing my own SSG to replace the god-slow Franklin right now, especially when Julia's joined the slop).
Julia's joined the slop
So have CPython and TypeScript 
xrvspython has been “the language for AI” and some of the recent PEPs are motivated by LLMs, and typescript is by microslop so i’m not really surprised
The context was SSG, @xarvos, so I was venting how difficult it is now to avoid supporting LLM when writing one, they (and Go and Rust) are the most popular languages, including to those writing syntax highlighters and math rendering. The reference implementation of Rust is now embracing the slop (so is Go's) too and neither gccrs nor mrustc has been able to keep up with the moving language (gccgo is on par with go though). @pinskia of GCC at least isn't open to LLM usages though I'd be interested in a concrete policy. Cc: @addison
hmm i just checked pypy and there doesn’t seem to be any obvious sign of slop code (but also no official statement against it either). i’ll check if my personal SSG can run on pypy
@cnx @pinskia @addison
RE: https://awkward.place/objects/73ebd0df-7ad8-44e3-8d9b-a3b5a9394a43
@xarvos, also check the libraries it uses 
@xarvos, art thou referring to pensive, because pygments are very much sloppy. BTW PyPy is not a bootstrapping implementation, i.e. it still requires some Python implementation to build and does not come with its own standard library.
ok maybe when i’m done with the architecture i’ll do a rewrite in a correct language ok 
