Lord of the Rings characters: screen time vs mentions in the book.

The further from the dotted line, the further off trend.

By reddit user austinw-8 https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/s/Dw7XqDxyEB

@infobeautiful

Tom Bombadil should be off the the bottom of the chart.

@Wintergr33n @infobeautiful Tom bombadil is the jar jar binks of LOTR

@julianlawson @infobeautiful

Whelp, Jar Jar made it into the movie.

Tom is like Yoda's drunk uncle.

@Wintergr33n @infobeautiful I feel like The Rings Of Power TV series more than made up for the Bombadil deficit.

@infobeautiful I love Legolas and Gimli being almost the same in number of mentions, but largely divergent in screen time.

Justice for dwarves!

@infobeautiful

Leaving out Glorfindal out of the movies was a shame 🥺

@infobeautiful what does the dotted line represent? What are its slope and intercept?
@hcf @infobeautiful I suspect that frodo defines the slope

@rcriii @infobeautiful yeah, ok, Frodo is the main character so it makes sense, I agree.

But the line doesn't touch the origin. I wonder why.

@hcf @infobeautiful I missed that! So maybe the line is a best fit forced through Frodo, i.e a kind of average?

Since the graph seems to only include characters appearing the books and no movie only characters,, it makes sense that the y intercept >0.

@infobeautiful How can Radagast and Tom Bombadil have the same screen time when Tom wasn't in the movies at all and Radagast had a fair bit of time? Or was he only in the Hobbit?
@drgroftehauge @infobeautiful
Radagast doesn't appear in the Lord of the Rings movies, only the Hobbit movies
On the other hand he appear in the Lord of the Rings books, but not in the Hobbit books
@francois6po @infobeautiful I feel like that deserves a special version of his data point
😜

@infobeautiful

asking as someone who isn't much versed in lord of the rings either books or films, does it make sense to juxtapose minutes to mentions?