Sidekiq's TUI is getting a lot closer to usable now. What should the actual binary be called? `skq` maybe? `skui`?
@getajobmike lol “skui” is so good
@jgarber @getajobmike My voice doesn't go very high, but I'd take it as high as it goes every time I pronounce it "squee".
@getajobmike Personally I associate “ui” with a visual window ui, not a terminal app. Even if it’s a TUI style. I would go with short and memorable for Sidekiq and not name it after the TUI. So skq or sdkq or something is great.
@getajobmike Also I am excited to use it.
`bin/kiq` is now available as a @sidekiq binary if you pull main. Feedback welcomed!
@getajobmike sidekiq-cli
@Ryanbigg @getajobmike can’t go wrong there. Folks can make any alias they wish
@jasonkarns @getajobmike I prefer it spelt out like this as I've "suffered" too much at the hands of cutesy names for projects. Name things what they are!
@Ryanbigg @jasonkarns sidecliq is an amazing name but I actually use and type in my terminal and nothing beats a short, easy to type name like kiq.

@getajobmike @Ryanbigg the way I see it is this:

1) Typing in terminal will typically be either tab-completed, or ctrl-r shell history matched, so first characters matter more than length.

2) short names are what aliases are for (customizable to the users own mnemonics or de-conflicted)

3) longer names in scripts are self-documenting

(Though #1 means de-conflicting from sidekiq would be good)

@getajobmike Partial to disemvowelment: sdkq
@getajobmike I am boring so would probably call it sidekiq-cli
@getajobmike sidecliq (cli has been hiding there forever)
@getajobmike kiq is great and might get people to remember it’s not sidekick (or maybe I’m the only one who’s seen people do that…)
@getajobmike skui is clearer, will be easier to remember