Ah, yet another riveting tome on the thrilling world of software maintenance via continuous integration 🤓. Because clearly, we need AI agents to fix our code while we sip artisanal lattes and attend endless meetings on Zoom ☕💻. Remember, the real challenge is not the code, but staying awake through this "groundbreaking" reading. 💤📚
https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.03823 #softwaremaintenance #continuousintegration #AIagents #techhumor #productivity #HackerNews #ngated
SWE-CI: Evaluating Agent Capabilities in Maintaining Codebases via Continuous Integration

Large language model (LLM)-powered agents have demonstrated strong capabilities in automating software engineering tasks such as static bug fixing, as evidenced by benchmarks like SWE-bench. However, in the real world, the development of mature software is typically predicated on complex requirement changes and long-term feature iterations -- a process that static, one-shot repair paradigms fail to capture. To bridge this gap, we propose \textbf{SWE-CI}, the first repository-level benchmark built upon the Continuous Integration loop, aiming to shift the evaluation paradigm for code generation from static, short-term \textit{functional correctness} toward dynamic, long-term \textit{maintainability}. The benchmark comprises 100 tasks, each corresponding on average to an evolution history spanning 233 days and 71 consecutive commits in a real-world code repository. SWE-CI requires agents to systematically resolve these tasks through dozens of rounds of analysis and coding iterations. SWE-CI provides valuable insights into how well agents can sustain code quality throughout long-term evolution.

arXiv.org