i am disconcerted by how many techies who saw through crypto *immediately* have fallen for AI krokodil
@davidgerard i can't explain it yet. maybe they saw a more immediate profit available in llm boosterism. maybe it attacks a different center of the brain.

@cap_ybarra @davidgerard There's a wide swath of techies that succumb to the allure of "usefulness". Crypto is easy for them to see through, because it has no fundamental use case that justifies its expense.

LLMs, on the other hand, have many apparent uses. Not only that, but techies love using tech to solve non-tech problems--often because they don't understand those problems, so assume the solution can be easily solved with tech. LLMs present themselves as the "anything solution", and it can badly do so many things (but: it does do them) that many techies just point at all the things it can do and go, "See how useful it is!"

LLMs are Dunning-Kruger wet dreams.

And what I'm learning is, so, so, SO many professional programmers are actually shitty programmers that can't even tell the difference between error-ridden slop and maintainable code.

@Azuaron @cap_ybarra @davidgerard "SO many professional programmers are actually shitty programmers that can't even tell the difference between error-ridden slop and maintainable code."
This also explains the existence of nodeJS and every js-frontend framework out there.

(Only half joking, i think the causality goes the other way: "everyone uses react, must be good programmming skill" -> everyone measures their skill on crap -> machines produce the crap -> machine output is great!