But really, relicensing a GPL codebase to MIT is uninteresting.
Let's do the interesting one, which is: vibe code a "clean room" reimplementation of an entire proprietary codebase! After all, Microsoft released a "shared source" proprietary version of Windows. Now try seeing what happens if you run THAT through the "turn it into public domain" machine
Win-win outcome, no matter how it goes
Winning option 1: yes, you can vibe code proprietary codebases into the public domain, allowing us to bootstrap proprietary codebases quickly
Winning option 2: stopping laundering of copyleft codebases
Either of these are interesting outcomes!
@cwebber I'm not sure that's slop, but I won't discount the possibility... 🤔 But this part is funny in the dark humor sort of way:
"...explicitly instructed Claude not to base anything on LGPL/GPL-licensed code."
So, you see, no problem... 🙄
Claude after being explicitly instructed not to base anything on LGPL/GPL-licensed code