deadymouseMar 4

What do you think about the fact that AI blurs the line between reality and fiction and devalues art and real people?

https://lemmy.world/post/43856342

What do you think about the fact that AI blurs the line between reality and fiction and devalues art and real people? - Lemmy.World

Firstly, art and creativity are turning into a kind of Lego constructor with minimal value, and secondly, it is becoming more and more difficult to trust the news, because AI makes better and better deepfakes; Thirdly, people, for example, I have a friend on the Internet, but due to the frequent use of AI, he has become quite apathetic, I try to support him and somehow help him, as I did before, but more and more often he just ignores me and brushes me off with a simple thank you or bye, and if we communicate, then not for long, since he does not listen to me, but usually he shows me masterpieces or memes that he has generated with the help of AI, calling it real art, honestly, it is more and more unpleasant for me to communicate with him. I hope I explained clearly, sorry, the exact explanations are not about me.

Show threadPrataiMar 5

Anyone that uses AI to compose music or make art is neither a musician, nor an artist- any more than I am a mathematician because I use a calculator.

It’s trash.

Show threadIconoclastMar 5
As a hobbyist photographer, I find it pretty amusing that when I use a device I just point at a target and press a button, it counts as art - but when I spend 3 hours tweaking a prompt to get exactly the image I want, suddenly it doesn’t. Seems way more like an ideological stance than a logical one.
Show thread𝕱𝖎𝖗𝖊𝖜𝖎𝖙𝖈𝖍Mar 5
There’s a lot more to good photography than just point and click
Show threadIconoclastMar 5
Not really. It doesn’t matter how bad someone is at it - people still accept it as art. You’d be a massive dick telling a beginner that their photography is so terrible it doesn’t even qualify as art. You can also take a great picture completely by accident, just like you can put a ton of effort into one and still end up with garbage.
Show threadPrataiMar 5

Any HUMAN being using learned skill to capture a photo is art. Because art is something produced by a mind that strives to create it.

AI is not art because AI can’t comprehend art.

Show threadIconoclastMar 5
A camera can’t comprehend art either - it’s just a tool a human uses to create it. AI doesn’t generate anything on its own either; it needs a human to operate it too. The camera isn’t the artist, Photoshop isn’t, a canvas and brush aren’t, Illustrator isn’t. They’re just tools. The artist is the human behind them.
Show threadPratai

Okay. I’m convinced you’re one of these “artists” I referred to. No one defends trash that hasn’t found a way to get something from it.

Stop with the camera thing. It’s a bad argument. It’s not remotely the same thing. And every time I hear it- which is a lot because it’s The only thing the “artists” and “musicians” use to defend their trash- it makes me cringe.

Mar 5 at 10:54pmWeb