schnurritoCongress Is Considering Abolishing Your Right to Be Anonymous Online
cmbabulCan everyone chill for just a fucking second, the deluge of insane news this week is unreal
That’s the point. Do enough crazy shit at once and most of it will be overlooked.
Take a break. Come back when you’re ready.
CosmicTurtle0 [he/him]
oddpixelPaywalled. Here’s an Archive.is link
It doesn’t have a paywall for me; sorry if it does for some people, I wouldn’t have linked to it if I had known this, but leaving it up because it clearly doesn’t for everyone.
Luminous5481 "Lawless Heathen" [they/them]might I suggest a little bit of uBlock Origin?
Just a tip: many"paywalled" sites actually load the content then obscure it with JavaScript - you can just click on the reading mode browser button to see the full article
paywalled. also, this is a good way to kill the internet. when everyone starts getting doxxed, all that will be left are the bots.
Dead internet theory will be in full effect
Mugita SokioAI can already do that with around 90% confidence.
ozonedHonestly, I look at this and I see a future where everyone runs their own Federated services. I can verify my child’s age as well as mine and I’m the best one to decide what they can and can’t see. So I only need to worry about me and my family.
Or a local community can run it for themselves.
A forced move away from social media, because they can’t afford the risk, to one where we all run our own stuff and can follow who we want.
This is only 1 possible outcome of course, and it’s wildly idealist, but it’s a future I’m going to push for no matter what. So I’m very biased, so don’t take my opinion into account. :D
Honestly, I look at this and I see a future where everyone runs their own Federated services
on mesh networks. these already exist for basic communication, and are pretty cheap to be a part of since you can either purchase ready-to-use communicators, or make your own. the relays can also run off very small solar panels, and be stuck in a tree, on a post, or on a roof because they are tiny. best of all, the government can’t control them and they feature E2EE.
you got any tutorials or suggested hardware to join a mesh network? id be interested… it’s only a matter of time before the public internet is just unusable.
Possibly linuxTo join you need to either have an established mesh network already (assuming you don’t want to start a ISP)
right i found meshtastic.org through lemmy … and its a cool concept … purchase some hardware and join the network… download app… and you can do text communication… i was just wondering if there were more robust mesh networks with more capabilities than a text message. id rather just get prepared for when the rug is pulled out from underneath us and we have to get an anal cavity search just to check the weather.
Reticulum seems cool since it can work over all kinds of different networking technologies, even regular ol’ WiFi and whatnot. Higher bandwidth channels can talk to lower bandwidth channels, and vice versa.
It has its own problems with scale and actual users out in the wild, as well as I believe some issues getting proper code contributions and consistent maintenance.
What exactly are you looking for?
Not OP, but I personally would like to see a mesh-based low-bandwidth HTTP alternative, like Gemini. A tool set for sharing things more persistent than text messaging (or ideally building other digital services with) while being compatible with the underlying lower performance hardware and wireless medium.
Http doesn’t have that much overhead (especially when you want to send things in the MB range)
What kinds of applications are you talking about? Are you thinking TCP/IP connectivity or something slower?
You can build a network mesh out of wireless point to point and 802.11s mesh networks. It is all TCP/IP networking so you can run any application you want over it.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babel_(protocol)
www.open-mesh.org/projects/batman-adv/wiki/Wiki
Edit:
I forgot about HaLow. It is lower bandwidth but it has a much longer range. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11ah
There are a few metros around the world that have higher speed community networks (NYC Mesh, Freifunk, etc). If you get a HAM license, you could try participating in stuff like AREDN which uses modified WiFi access points. Depending on where you are, you’d likely have to start a group or club to start building out infrastructure.
DFX4509Bthe government can’t control them
- They can use signal jammers to take them out pretty easily.
well if the government wants to put signal jammers every mile or so in order to jam a mesh network, then good on them. they’ll have spent trillions of dollars and years upon years building the infrastructure.
and if they don’t spend trillions to blanket the entire country with jammers, then it would be absolutely pointless because the network would just work around whatever gaps there are, just as it does today.
No. They identify your location, confiscate all your stuff, give you a stiff fine and then send you to jail.
Yeah, they’re already trying to go after people who criticize them, and they control vast swaths of the internet, so I’m not going to let some handwringing about what they might do stop me.
FredselfishI like to join your community and you can help me setup one for me and my family. Fuck social media and corporate.
I have a Matrix #the-ozoned:matrix.org . While I don’t know a lot, I have quite a few number of folks that do. Or we can all learn and figure things out! I’m often here or on @[email protected] as well as my Peertube, TubeFree.org, powered by my nonprofit BTfree.org.
Just say what you need and we can find someone that can make it happen. :-)
Thank you definitely going check all that out.
Honestly, I look at this and I see a future where everyone runs their own Federated services
I very much doubt it. People in general just don’t care, or even worse. They think that it is a good thing as it keeps baddies out (it won’t) and it will protect them (it won’t).
It seems line very dark times are ahead. Self hosting is good, but it also gives the other side a bright shining beacon to go after. If they know everything about 99% of the population already, they can spend a lot more resources to really get to know the last percent that actively tries to avoid it.
It’s irritating that normies eat up any legislation sold as “protecting kids.” It’s like it shuts off a part of the brain.
shani66The founding fathers didn’t think everyone should vote, and frankly i think they’re right. They had the wrong criteria, sure, but the average person is so gullible, uninformed, and just plain stupid that i genuinely think they (and everyone else) would be better off without a say.
But how to be more selective without it being abused by horrible people? I’ve got no real idea.
So now is when you go out and get a few throwaway email accounts on as many odd sites as you can. My fb page is a nom-de-plume and has been for over a decade…
There is an article making these claims every 2-3 years. Sanitize your digital foot print, and try to create a degree or two of separation between you and the info you surrender online if it bothers you. Leave social media completely. Then accept that nothing you do online is truly anonymous if enough money and time is thrown at finding out who you are. This is the trade off with the current state of the internet until there is some headway made on repealing so of these privacy diminishing laws. Seems like a tall order to me to be hopeful that will happen.
There is no right to be anonymous on the internet. The information highway is a highway, it’s public.
How soon before the Iron Firecurtain drops and the Fourth Reich blocks the entire internet and locks you into a state intranet like China and NK do?
marsha blackburn is a gential wart.
not one of the cute fuzzy ones either. nope, she’s one of the inflamed itchy ones that oozes puss and smells like a rotting potato.
i hope she falls in a hole and never finds her way out.
do you wish it?
“Let the government put a video camera in your bedroom to verify you aren’t molesting kids. If you fight against this, that means you are molesting kids”
-use this argument anytime someone thinks this is about protecting kids.
I tried something similar with my brother-in-law. He is not against chat control in Europe (we live in Denmark), so I asked him to give me his phone, unlock it and let me play around with it without him in the same room. He refused, but still has “nothing to hide”. He has not changed his mind…
wabafeeAnd then do nothing when handed one of the biggest child sexual abuse cases ever.