@jerry I would never sign up for an instance that wasn't open. I'm not going to be pre-judged by anybody. Just. No.
Ewww.
I understand the administrative burden, but 🤢.
AI bots yaaaaaay
Honestly, Jerry is doing an amazing job.
I mean if you don't like to be pre-judged, you can always self-host?
@13reak You lock down registrations, you're excluding anyone not willing to write an essay justifying themselves.
And there was no attack on Jerry in that.
@clonezone Seriously? Write an essay? The most you have to do is prove your human by just saying some things. I know you feel like it's a personal attack on you, but it isn't
@clonezone Nothing wrong with open registrations, but it should be done VERY intentionally and only by someone willing to take on that administrative burden. It should be private by default.
@rbos
The "administrative burden" for open registration doesn't rest on the admins of that instance.
- It falls on every user who sees the spam it causes and reports that to their own admins.
- It falls on the admins of all the other instances who have to process these reports, act on them and maybe have to decide if it's better to silence or defederate that instance rather than whacking dozens or hundreds of spambots originating there.
- It falls on all those people who have to clean up the mess after someone got taken in by a scam.
@tarix29 Nope. Not going to justify myself in the least to anyone.
Again, I understand that there are administrative costs to this.
But. No. 🤬. Way.
@clonezone @tarix29 But then why are you even here?
Every post on a social platform is a de facto justification, you just want the privilege of being assumed a good guy when there are waves of folks cogently arguing why it's so important to require folks to demonstrate good faith before welcoming them to the community.
@clonezone @tarix29 Consider that a less entitled attitude may be warranted by the nonprofit nature of the platform.
There are no ads, no trackers, no paywalls, no nothing. Each user increases the administrative and technical burden of their instance, and there's nothing to recoup that cost aside from donations. If a user doesn't donate to their instance, then strictly speaking, that's all they are: a burden. The instance is measurably worse off with them on it.
Isn't it a little rude to act like you're entitled to an instance's server space for free?
Attached: 4 images Spammers have been programmatically creating accounts on Mastodon instances for years. Sometimes they post once and never again, sometimes they post on a schedule. Sometimes they never post, like a waiting botnet. As Mastodon's anti-spam solutions are effectively nonexistent, most instances in our network require manual approval of new accounts. Up until recently, it was easy to spot a spammer; their join reasons were generic. ChatGPT spammers have now arrived. #MastoAdmin #FediAdmin #spam
@13reak @clonezone @jerry dude I do a lot of self hosting myself but if you really think hosting a fucking social network is something everyone should be doing you really need to go outside and touch some grass. Get in touch with reality. I swear everyone in this thread is a fricking psychopath.
No. Not everyone should close their instances. Most are open and for good reason. Gatekeeping is not a valid solution.
Jerry 🦙💝🦙
Elliot Shank
13reak 
Lydia Conwell
ohir
Rob Bos
Landa 
Chewie
Caden
Sharpe!
Mïkê 💚 👑🐉🗡️🏳️⚧️
ARGVMI~1.PIF
Austin Huang ❤️
⁂ Jnk ∞ 📎