Bob LeFridge  

Yesterday Helen Clark rightly condemned the Trump regime's illegal and ongoing attacks on Iran, in breach of international law. Today's Stuff headline proclaims "Christopher Luxon hits back".

But does he? Really?

"Meanwhile on RNZ, Luxon refused to explicitly say whether New Zealand supports the Iran strikes or not."

"Asked if the strikes were the right thing to do morally, Luxon danced around the subject."

It strikes me that "Spineless Luxon dances on the head of a pin" might have been a more accurate headline.

Our PM lacks a moral backbone.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/360945371/christopher-luxon-hits-back-after-helen-clark-brands-iran-response-disgrace

#NZPol #Luxon #Clark #Iran

Stuff

Mar 1 at 7:54pmWeb
Show threadJohn Valentine Mar 1
@BobLefridge Luxon was asked by my count eight times on RNZ to tell us if he supported the bombing of Iran and he wouldn't give a clear answer.
Show threadJeremyJupiterJones Mar 1

@BobLefridge

To be fair to Luxon, he is obviously aware that the unlawful and immoral terror attacks on Iran are neither legal or in the interests of the rules based order NZ so desperately needs to survive. That being said a real leader would make this argument in opposition to the terrorist Epstein Empire’s actions.