I personally use AI only in the context of research *on* AI. I intentionally don’t use it to facilitate my research and I currently feel that’s the right choice for me.

But I know many researchers choosing differently who are both excellent scientists and individuals with integrity who I respect as people.

The response which, like clockwork, either tells such researchers that they don’t understand how these systems work and they’re garbage and/or that the researchers themselves are morally deficient people isn’t changing minds.

It’s hard for me to see it as helpful.

@UlrikeHahn Yes, unfortunately it seems to be really good technology for dividing people.

@UlrikeHahn From where I'm standing, those people are abandoning intellectual integrity.

I don't feel comfortable either endorsing that or being silent about it.

@jmax so, you would like to change people’s minds then?

@UlrikeHahn - Yes. But explaining doesn't do it. They keep treating the crap machine like it has value.

I could live with keeping my mouth shut and simply losing all respect for them.

But that's not good enough for them. They want me to buy into their delusion.

@jmax who is “them” referring to here?
@UlrikeHahn so what discourse would you recommend?
@antoinechambertloir well, I can’t see meaningful outcomes without actually trying to understand what exactly people are using these systems for and how they think about the various implications (scientific and ethical) and engaging with that