MalloryMar 1
I did a little experiment this week for funsies. Last week I posted a pic of M81 and M82 that I got with my Seestar S30, and I decided to replicate it with my best astrophotography rig (Askar 130PHQ + ASI2600MC). Obviously, there's a huge difference between the two setups, but I stuck with 60 second subs like I did on the S30, about the same integration time, exactly the same light pollution level, and processing was done with the same tools.

This gives you an idea of how much more detail is available using a scope that's ~7x larger and a better camera.

Full resolution and capture details: https://app.astrobin.com/i/c24ufh?r=0

#astronomy #astrophotography #SeestarS30
Show threadrdm

@malcircuit
That is one of the best comparisons I've seen!

It really drives home how much better a pro rig is.

On the flip side, assuming a new site, I imagine the setup time is considerably different. But, on the gripping hand, given that it is a rig you are well familiar with, probably less of a difference that it might otherwise be.

Intrigued to hear what the difference was.

Mar 1 at 4:27amWeb
Show threadMalloryMar 1
Oh yeah, the Seestar is ready to image in a few minutes, while the big rig would take at least an hour to get put together, set up, and running. Actually, probably double or triple that time if you take loading and unloading it all in to/out of my car into consideration. There's a reason I have a Seestar lol
Show threadrdmMar 1

@malcircuit
Hmm. That is more than I was expecting, but not that much more. I was thinking 30-45 minutes, based on how long it takes me to setup my GOTO rig, which is much, much simpler.

It makes you wonder about the pro level Vaonis rigs.
(The 11k+ ones!)

Show threadMalloryMar 1
Also, I recently re-read The Mote In God's Eye so I greatly appreciate your use of "on the gripping hand" lol