This gives you an idea of how much more detail is available using a scope that's ~7x larger and a better camera.
Full resolution and capture details: https://app.astrobin.com/i/c24ufh?r=0
#astronomy #astrophotography #SeestarS30
@malcircuit
That is one of the best comparisons I've seen!
It really drives home how much better a pro rig is.
On the flip side, assuming a new site, I imagine the setup time is considerably different. But, on the gripping hand, given that it is a rig you are well familiar with, probably less of a difference that it might otherwise be.
Intrigued to hear what the difference was.
@malcircuit
Hmm. That is more than I was expecting, but not that much more. I was thinking 30-45 minutes, based on how long it takes me to setup my GOTO rig, which is much, much simpler.
It makes you wonder about the pro level Vaonis rigs.
(The 11k+ ones!)
@malcircuit both. The stars seemed both brighter and yes larger as well.
I'm mostly a visual observer ... was a visual observer. I have eyepieces more expensive than my S50. I don't use them. Most winters here now one grabs an hr or 2 when one can. The seestar has given me more observing time than all my other scopes. I do sit outside and watch the photons appear on the iPad though. Tradition and all that.
@malcircuit What a great comparison! What’s stunning about the clarity of the second one is that, along the top third of the image, I can see at least two smudges no larger than stars that appear to be very distant galaxies. Have those been identified?
While M1 and M2 are better in the second one, weirdly I think I prefer the stars in the first, which have more of a glow around them. I think stars become a bit less interesting the more they resolve into sharp pinpoints.😅
Excellent work.