Well now we know who's REALLY in charge of the Scottish branch office. Yes, it's sleekit, slimy, scumbag "Scottish Secretary", wee Doogie Alexander.
That's you tellt, Anus.
DOUGLAS ALEXANDER TELLS ANAS SARWAR 'NOT TO COMMENTATE ON UK POLITICS'
Well now we know who's REALLY in charge of the Scottish branch office. Yes, it's sleekit, slimy, scumbag "Scottish Secretary", wee Doogie Alexander.
That's you tellt, Anus.
DOUGLAS ALEXANDER TELLS ANAS SARWAR 'NOT TO COMMENTATE ON UK POLITICS'
@decembr14 This is how I see it
When it expands you may well, but it is still a shortened url. And archive.is does give you the full one.
Just saying…
@Wen
Look, I'm not going to get into a long debate about this, but it does NOT 'expand'. That is the actual URL on the archive.is site. Yes, archive.is does state on the page the ORIGINAL article URL, which if you copy/paste it into your browser will take you to The National website, where you may or may not be able be abe to view it, depending on whether it is paywalled.
archive.is is an archiving site, not a URL shortening service. Full copies of articles are stored on archive.is servers.
@decembr14 I won’t either. And yes I know what archive.is is and I know what it does. I also understand why you have referred or archived The National site. But surely even you can understand you have posted a shortened url that redirects to something that is not clear. And can result in an archived document that is unsafe.
And yes we do security as well.
@Wen
Absolutely the last word.
IT IS NOT REDIRECTING. Watch your browser address bar - the URL does not change.
It is an archive.is URL for a page on the archive.is website, being a COPY of an article elsewhere. The URL does not redirect you away from the archive.is website.
I'm sorry, you may think you "do security" as well but you clearly do not understand this distinction. And please don't call me 'lazy'; that was simply rude.
@decembr14 I’m last word. Click on the link you provide and it opens in a browser window (sampled in a ‘clean’ browser running on a virtual machine. The document is one archived on archive.is. Any document can be archived there, and yes a malicious one can be we have demonstrated that.
So yes, lazy and unnecessary.