☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆I wonder if Carney understands what endorsement of unilateral action for regime change by the US could mean for Canadian sovereignty going forward.
AverageGoobSooooo the Davos speech meant nothing… Got it.
as shocked as you are
ArmchairAce1944He attacked a leftist slogan as being meaningless and no one believing it.
Carney is a slave to money and nothing else.
When he kept all the same ministers and appointed Gregor Robinson as housing minister, after he destroyed Vancouver’s real estate sector, it was immediately obvious.
Even Mark Wiseman of the century initiative is there, after his hair brained mass immigration scheme decimated the poor.
I’m not sure I’d call his speech endorsement. He said they shouldn’t be allowed nuclear arms. He didn’t say he supported them being attacked.
Why are we pretending the Iranian government is good after killing thousands of protestors a few weeks ago?
This is Trump illegally invading a country again, and that country has awful regressive leadership. There’s no good guy here.
𝕱𝖎𝖗𝖊𝖜𝖎𝖙𝖈𝖍No one is pretending the Iranian government is good. Both sides of a conflict can absolutely suck for different reasons
PlaidBaronIf our government actually had some moral backbone they would continue to condemn Iran and alo condemn the US attack.
But they dont.
The point you evidently missed here is that Carney is legitimizing the same logic that Trump can apply to Canada next.
Kinda nothing. The US has no obligation to look up our past rhetorical precedents, if they invade.
Canada being an enemy of Iran isn’t new, and the US is definitely able to do this, so there would be no payoff to condemning it.
and yet you’ll have cry babys say you support genocide if you take this stance. its infuriating that some people here still act like shitty redditers who think the the leader of a nation should get involved in pointless conflicts when we are not strong enough to even fully protect ourselves.
Not being able to stop it, still leaves a big gap between applauding it and criticizing a needless action to cause many deaths in the world.
Except he’s a world leader, not a shitposter, so his words actually have tangible repercussions in terms of blowback.
There’s no prize for most telling-it-as-it-is here. Global politics is not a Twitter thread.
I’ve also seen Reddit/Lemmy suggest dropping nukes on Russia is a good, moral and safe idea, and I’ve seen it often.
Like, why would you play armchair general, if you’re not actually interested in how any of this works?