@stroughtonsmith Perhaps. This begs the question: what is the average startup doing? Most fail. Most don't produce anything of appreciable value.
The idea of this being commodified can sound dire, but it also might be a good thing. How many good ideas are never explored because the originator of the thought lacks the capital—monetary, human or otherwise—to take action on that idea? Reducing the cost of shots-on-goal seems like a good thing.
@stroughtonsmith There's another angle here which is licensing. Under current law, stuff not made by humans is non-copywritable. AI generated assets are, by all current precedent, in the public domain.
If that holds, anything made by the AI-Company-In-A-Box becomes a public good.
@stroughtonsmith It would be a dramatic overturning of existing precedent. The largest change to copyright law since Disney stepped on the scale.
I think it would be dangerous and cultural suicide. The chance for cultural and political blowback is significant. So yeah, solid chance OpenAI lobbies for it hard. They and their kin are clearly ghouls.
@stroughtonsmith It's holding so far!
Obviously not a code case, but definitely the same ballpark. Treat AI-created code you generate as public domain! It may well be so!