THREAD

1/

I’ve gotten quite a few messages from disabled people who benefit from AI in the same way I do but feel unable to admit to it because they are scared of backlash.

I will start by saying I understand concerns about AI, they are real. AI is energy intensive, data centres use water, a resource that is already scarce in many places, and the companies behind these products are unethical in so many ways.

#AI #Ethics #Scotland #Disability #UK #LLM

2/

But something feels off in how this debate is being handled. We live inside unethical systems constantly. That is our baseline as humans in the 21st century.

3/

The aviation industry is a good example It is hugely environmentally destructive, and bound to inequality (only 10 - 11% of the world's population takes a flight in any given year, with only about 2 - 4% traveling internationally annually. Despite high passenger numbers, an estimated 80% of the global population has never flown in an airplane!) and yet we don’t generally judge people for flying. In fact travel has come to be seen as so essential that we don’t really put limits on it at all

4/

I’m sure you would all agree however that there are ways to be an ethical user of this incredibly unethical industry? I think AI should be treated the same way.

5/

Collapsing all AI use into one immoral category doesn’t make sense to me. Frivolously chatting to it all day, repeatedly generating images for fun, or asking it to write your book is not the same as asking AI to help navigate the labour and bureaucracy of disability, or the pressures of other forms of inequality.

6/

For me the distinction is between creative and functional work. I don’t want AI to be part of the process of my creative work, but AI being involved in the functional work of managing my disability frees up space for the creative work which feels integral to my happy existence as a human being.

7/

For a bit of context, a return flight from Scotland to Spain uses roughly the same amount of energy as hundreds of thousands of substantial text only AI interactions. That’s a lifetime’s worth of pretty heavy AI use. Something, somewhere in our thinking has gotten skewed. This is not to advocate for, or excuse excessive AI use, it's to ask that judgement is proportional and accurate.

8/

I understand that drawing these stark moral lines feels very clean and very clear but I think that it can often end up protecting harmful existing heirarchies.

9/

I’m not aguing for a ‘fuck it’ attitude to AI use, not at all. We need to approach this powerful technology in a considered and careful way. It needs to be heavily regulated at the policy end too. What I’m asking people to see is that it is possible act ethically within an unethical system (there are exampels everywhere!) and that if we care about ethics we must make sure that our judgement is ethical too.

END

@kristiedegaris there’s the hidden exploitation of cheap labor in Africa to sanitize the content, the concentration of power by fascist techbros, the cheapening of art and facts, the racist, sexist, western biases in the source data, the non consensual use of people’s creative labor which is then rented back to them, the pressure on wages, the documented effects on cognition, addiction, the drowning of the web in slop, etc. It’s spectacular really. I don’t think there’s any ethical use of GenAI.
@kristiedegaris could have added the generation of deep fakes, non consensual porn, CSAM, the hoarding of RAM and hard disks which are becoming expensive and rare, the super short lifespan of the GPUs that are over clocked and end up in landfills, the strain on web servers that are scraped non stop and on open source software projects that are inundated with garbage code. I don’t think the comparison with air travel even remotely flies if you’ll pardon the bad pun.

@sknob I will pardon the pun.

It's a pretty good comparison. Look into the issues that air travel causes globally including what the travel industry does socially, politically, psychologically etc. It's just as vast.

When you take it apart, every huge capitalist industry looks a lot like AI does on the inside.

@kristiedegaris air travel didn’t start out that way and it’s been with us for decades. Look at the damage wrought by GenAI in a mere 3 years. And it is an intrinsically totalitarian technology for the simple reason that it discourages using one’s own brain. Air travel is bad enough without adding the impact of GenAI (personally I shun both).
It depends on how you use it. If I could afford a personal assistant I would have one and no one would tell me that's me not using my own brain. Using AI to help navigate a truly bureaucracy and admin heavy system is not not using my own brain. So maybe AI use can be evaluated on an individual level?
I haven't flown in nearly a decade now. I feel like I am able to do that. I don't need it for work or to see family and I travelled a bit in my youth. It doesn't mean I condemn all others who use air travel. Some people have to.