THREAD

1/

I’ve gotten quite a few messages from disabled people who benefit from AI in the same way I do but feel unable to admit to it because they are scared of backlash.

I will start by saying I understand concerns about AI, they are real. AI is energy intensive, data centres use water, a resource that is already scarce in many places, and the companies behind these products are unethical in so many ways.

#AI #Ethics #Scotland #Disability #UK #LLM

2/

But something feels off in how this debate is being handled. We live inside unethical systems constantly. That is our baseline as humans in the 21st century.

3/

The aviation industry is a good example It is hugely environmentally destructive, and bound to inequality (only 10 - 11% of the world's population takes a flight in any given year, with only about 2 - 4% traveling internationally annually. Despite high passenger numbers, an estimated 80% of the global population has never flown in an airplane!) and yet we don’t generally judge people for flying. In fact travel has come to be seen as so essential that we don’t really put limits on it at all

4/

I’m sure you would all agree however that there are ways to be an ethical user of this incredibly unethical industry? I think AI should be treated the same way.

5/

Collapsing all AI use into one immoral category doesn’t make sense to me. Frivolously chatting to it all day, repeatedly generating images for fun, or asking it to write your book is not the same as asking AI to help navigate the labour and bureaucracy of disability, or the pressures of other forms of inequality.

6/

For me the distinction is between creative and functional work. I don’t want AI to be part of the process of my creative work, but AI being involved in the functional work of managing my disability frees up space for the creative work which feels integral to my happy existence as a human being.

7/

For a bit of context, a return flight from Scotland to Spain uses roughly the same amount of energy as hundreds of thousands of substantial text only AI interactions. That’s a lifetime’s worth of pretty heavy AI use. Something, somewhere in our thinking has gotten skewed. This is not to advocate for, or excuse excessive AI use, it's to ask that judgement is proportional and accurate.

8/

I understand that drawing these stark moral lines feels very clean and very clear but I think that it can often end up protecting harmful existing heirarchies.

9/

I’m not aguing for a ‘fuck it’ attitude to AI use, not at all. We need to approach this powerful technology in a considered and careful way. It needs to be heavily regulated at the policy end too. What I’m asking people to see is that it is possible act ethically within an unethical system (there are exampels everywhere!) and that if we care about ethics we must make sure that our judgement is ethical too.

END

@kristiedegaris As far as I am concerned, the only justifiable use of "AI" is in Big Science, for the purpose of doing data operations at a speed greater than humans can manage, as this is useful for drug discovery, mapping protein folding, searching huge image databases of the stars and of the surface of the Earth, among other things.
Using it for things that merely require "auto complete", or for customer services, or for surveillance of any kind, is NOT OK.
@LillyHerself I agree, but what about me for example, a disabled woman with fatigue and brain fog who has to navigate an admin and bureaucracy heavy health care system? That's not auto complete or customer service or surveillance. What should people like me do if you're against this tool? Can you help me write the letters and emails?
@kristiedegaris One shouldn't compare illnesses perhaps, but I have ME-CFS, which comprises brain fog, disruption of executive function and extreme low energy both mental and physical.
There is staff at council level who are very patient and can help w benefits, and there is the patient organisation, who can team you up with a volunteer for trickier things. I believe they help LC folk too.
There is also citizens advice. Med/dental/opticians are difficult to deal with if you are alone.

@LillyHerself I began using AI around a year ago, there was twenty years of effort for myself beforehand, and four years before AI for my daughter. I almost laughed at your comment, you think we didn't try all you suggested and more?

Judging what you think other people should do purely based on what worked for you isn't a great framework. I generally assume people worked as hard as I did, problem solved as well as I did, asked for help as well as I did and THEN resorted to the robots.

@LillyHerself I do not agree at all with universalising our own experiences like this, or the idea that effort alone can explains outcomes. Like if I had just tried harder I wouldn't find myself here using AI. You're also listing resources like they are evenly distributed and accessible. And there is still labour required to access and then maintain access to resources when they are available!