moreover, nobody who has ever tried to use any llm to do code stuff for hours/days/weeks at a time is panicking either.

even people who are deep experts in what they do, who use llms to do stuff day to day, have to put a brick in a tube sock, put that in another tube sock, and swing it hard to bash the llm in the face over and over again to get it to behave and obey. and often that workout takes as much time as not using an llm.

everyone shitting their pants is signaling.

fucking good.
"security as we know it" is pay to play, zero boundaries, fraught with grifters, liars and cheats, shitloads of friendly-fire, people buying cert bootcamps to get people fake creditiblity, overdependence on shit like the cissp, people with zero computer experience directing whole armies of super technical folks

let it end.
it desperately needs a reboot.

@Viss

According to the AI developer, Claude Code Security is context-aware - as opposed to simply doing static code analysis. It "reads and reasons about your code the way a human security researcher would: understanding how components interact, tracing how data moves through your application, and catching complex vulnerabilities that rule-based tools miss," the company said.

It's really hard to tell the difference between a human and the masterful work of our friend Claude.