we're tired of hearing "it's just a tool" because, well, a) we disagree and

b) let's pretend that we agree. okay, it's a tool: who made it? why did they make it? what is this tool good at doing? is it any better at doing it than the previous methods by which we would do this thing? why should i use it for that? can you demonstrate the tool's utility in a situation i propose? are the tradeoffs worth the benefits? can you answer *any* of these questions?

but no, people just say "it's just a tool" and it's inevitable and we just have to get used to it, no questioning allowed, no objections allowed (see also: the cries of discrimination coming from adafruit) , and the conversation stops there. weird, huh.

it is not a tool, it is a an informational dirty bomb, it is a mechanism by which the worst people on the planet are enriching themselves at the expense of your ability to find information. it has no liberatory uses — it must be resisted by force.
@atax1a well put
@ireneista @atax1a So far we have seen no justification of the use of LLMs or "generative AI" that aren't either vague and unconvincing, or clearly about mere speed or bulk volume. Not to get all Catholic here but...is it really a good idea for the tech sector to be encouraging our sins? The sin of impatience, in this case.
@mxchara @ireneista @atax1a y'know, I'm realizing all the very strong anti-ai people I know are (at least a bit) Catholic.
@pencilears @mxchara @ireneista @atax1a y'know who else whispers in your ear "look, if you just stop worrying and do everything I tell you to, your life would be sooo much easier"? That's right: The Devil. From The Bible.
@pencilears @mxchara @ireneista @atax1a "brooo just turn that rock into bread, it'll be so tasty, since when has a little snack hurt anyone?" nice try, mr altman, but I am out here in the desert for a long time, not for a good one.