I was disappointed to read Cory Doctorow's post where he got weirdly defensive about his LLM use and started arguing with an imaginary foe.

@tante has a very thoughtful reply here:

https://tante.cc/2026/02/20/acting-ethical-in-an-imperfect-world/
A few further comments, 🧵>>

Acting ethically in an imperfect world

Life is complicated. Regardless of what your beliefs or politics or ethics are, the way that we set up our society and economy will often force you to act against them: You might not want to fly somewhere but your employer will not accept another mode of transportation, you want to eat vegan but are […]

Smashing Frames
It was particularly disappointing to see Doctorow misconstrue (and thus, if he is believed) undermine the work that many of us are doing to shine a light on the ways in which the ideology of "AI" and the specific ways in which LLMs and other "AI" products are created do real harm.
>>

I also want to point out (again) the ways in which lumping together all uses of LMs (like the lumping of technologies into "AI") obscures the issues at hand.

Language modeling is a useful component of many technologies that can be built without extractive, exploitative means. Take the automatic transcription built by and for the Māori people -- there's te reo Māori language model that's part of that.
>>

@emilymbender

Oh c'mon! Let not facts stand in the way of the Luddite hordes...
...least you be denounced as a broligarch/techbro by the righteous!

@n_dimension @emilymbender

I'm with Lord Byron on the Luddites:

@ecadre @n_dimension

Heh! I'm often reminded (and the piece below does a gorgeous job with the subject, incl referencing Byron's poem) that Luddism wasn't anti-progress / anti-tech / reactionary :) That's how the victors rewrote it, as they so often do.

https://thenib.com/im-a-luddite/

@emilymbender

I’m a Luddite (and So Can You!) | The Nib

What the Luddites can teach us about resisting an automated future.

The Nib