AI is “taking away jobs” in the same way that a car is “found on tram tracks”

The thing itself isn’t doing any of that

It is the bosses and billionaires chomping at the bit to find a new excuse to demoralise and get rid of workers to bolster the elite economy, rather than the plebian economy

Blaming it on AI is removing responsibility from the person driving the change, much in the same way that such phrasing dispels the responsibility of drivers from driving onto tram tracks

All of these choices are not based on AI as it is, but on AI as they would like it to be.

They are desperate to cut headcount because employment is expensive, and they are hoping that a machine that plays dominos with language can replace even the least trained human

As any reviewer tells you, never judge a product based on what it claims to be in the future, only on present performance

But after spending billions on this bullshit, after scuttling tens of thousands of workers collectively, to realise that they made a mistake is the most egregious sin — it is better to double down on believing you are right than to is to admit that you made a costly mistake in born money and cutting workers

To blame AI as a concept is absurd, it is feeding into this popular idea, based on science fiction tropes, about the evil sapient computer

There is no evil sapient computer, there is only an evil sapient rich fucker instead

@yassie_j It's funny how in a labour shortage we're all supposed to accept that things get worse and more expensive, but once a company supposedly increases productivity it's okay to make people redundant rather than make things better or more affordable.
@yassie_j cars are not "found on tram tracks" because i moved them over an unsupervised (machine or human) level crossing then rammed them with a pacer