realized i was spending too much time defending a stranger and not enough time trying to change things, so
fluxer's contributor guidelines currently endorse the use of LLMs in contributions. i created an issue where i walk through some arguments for why they shouldn't: https://github.com/fluxerapp/fluxer/issues/435
if we want things to change, we sometimes have to do the hard work of convincing the people running them that they should. fluxer isn't run by a faceless corporation, it's one person, and people can be swayed by reasonable discussion.
if you want to contribute any additional sources to the claims i made in the issue, or provide additional technical, philosophical, or social arguments as to why it's a bad idea to accept LLM contributions, i endorse your contributions to that issue.
but, i'd ask folks to please not reply on that issue with generalizing statements like "everyone who uses LLM tools are lazy and incompetent" even if thats something you privately think -- i'm trying to argue this point in good faith that they are a reasonable person who can listen to evidence and consider the viewpoint.

Consider revising contributor guidelines concerning LLM tool use · Issue #435 · fluxerapp/fluxer
What needs fixing? This issue concerns the following section of CONTRIBUTING.md: Understand the code you submit ... LLM-assisted contributions. You're welcome to use LLMs as a tool for automating m...